Literature DB >> 10501910

A phase I evaluation of multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231514), administered every 21 days, utilizing the modified continual reassessment method for dose escalation.

D A Rinaldi1, J G Kuhn, H A Burris, F A Dorr, G Rodriguez, S G Eckhardt, S Jones, J R Woodworth, S Baker, C Langley, D Mascorro, T Abrahams, D D Von Hoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine toxicities, maximally tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic profile, and potential antitumor activity of MTA, a novel antifolate compound which inhibits the enzymes thymidylate synthase (TS), glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT), and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR).
METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were given MTA intravenously over 10 min every 21 days. Dose escalation was based on the modified continual reassessment method (MCRM), with one patient treated at each minimally toxic dose level. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in all patients.
RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (27 males, 10 females, median age 59 years, median performance status 90%) were treated with 132 courses at nine dose levels, ranging from 50 to 700 mg/m(2). The MTD of MTA was 600 mg/m(2), with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and cumulative fatigue as the dose-limiting toxicities. Hematologic toxicity correlated with renal function and mild reversible renal dysfunction was observed in multiple patients. Other nonhematologic toxicities observed included mild to moderate fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, mucositis, rash, and reversible hepatic transaminase elevations. Three patients expired due to drug-related complications. Pharmacokinetic analysis during the first course of treatment at the 600 mg/m(2) dose level demonstrated a mean harmonic half-life, maximum plasma concentration (Cpmax), clearance (CL), area under the curve (AUC), and apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) of 3.08 h, 137 microg/ml, 40.0 ml/min per m(2), 266 microg. h/ml, and 7.0 l/m(2), respectively. An average of 78% of the compound was excreted unchanged in the urine. Partial responses were achieved in two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and in two patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Minor responses were obtained in six patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The MTD and dose for phase II clinical trials of MTA when administered intravenously over 10 min every 21 days was 600 mg/m(2). MTA is a promising new anticancer agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10501910     DOI: 10.1007/s002800050992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  26 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided trial design in oncology.

Authors:  Ch van Kesteren; R A A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  A prospective study of shortened vitamin supplementation prior to cisplatin-pemetrexed therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Takagi; Yukio Hosomi; Kuniko Sunami; Yoshiro Nakahara; Yusuke Okuma; Makiko Yomota; Tsuneo Shimokawa; Makoto Nagamata; Mari Iguchi; Hiroaki Okamoto; Tatsuru Okamura; Masahiko Shibuya
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-09-26

3.  Pemetrexed-induced acute renal failure, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and renal tubular acidosis in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Vidya Vootukuru; Yin Ping Liew; Joseph V Nally
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Pemetrexed combined with paclitaxel: a dose-finding study evaluating three schedules in solid tumors.

Authors:  Axel-R Hanauske; Herlinde Dumez; Martine Piccart; Emine Yilmaz; Tobias Graefe; Thierry Gil; Lorinda Simms; Luna Musib; Ahmad Awada
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Phase II study of bevacizumab and pemetrexed for recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea R Hagemann; Akiva P Novetsky; Israel Zighelboim; Feng Gao; L Stewart Massad; Premal H Thaker; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Impact of renal function on treatment options and outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bercin Kutluk Cenik; Han Sun; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  In vitro study on the schedule-dependency of the interaction between pemetrexed, gemcitabine and irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer cells.

Authors:  An Wouters; Bea Pauwels; Filip Lardon; Greet G O Pattyn; Hilde A J Lambrechts; Marc Baay; Paul Meijnders; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Phase 2 trial of pemetrexed in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Anne B Warwick; Suman Malempati; Mark Krailo; Allen Melemed; Richard Gorlick; Matthew M Ames; Stephanie L Safgren; Peter C Adamson; Susan M Blaney
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  A phase II trial of pemetrexed in patients with metastatic renal cancer.

Authors:  R Thödtmann; T Sauter; S Weinknecht; L Weissbach; J Blatter; U Ohnmacht; A- R Hanauske
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Acute Tubular Necrosis and Interstitial Nephritis during Pemetrexed Therapy.

Authors:  Judith Michels; Jean Philippe Spano; Isabelle Brocheriou; Gilbert Deray; David Khayat; Hassane Izzedine
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2009-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.