W Brinkert1, J H Rommes, J Bakker. 1. ZcA Lukas Hospital, Department of Intensive Care, P. O. Box 9014, 7300 DS Apeldoorn, The Netherlands. acutgen@wxs.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare a recently introduced hand-held lactate analyser to a reference point of care analyser (POCI) and the hospital laboratory in a critical care setting. SETTING: 10-bed surgical/medical intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 39 critically ill patients, 50 convenience measurement cycles consisting of three paired measurements at 30-min intervals were carried out with a hand-held analyser, reference POCI and hospital laboratory using arterial blood samples. Duplicate measurements with the hand-held analyser were done in 129 blood samples. RESULTS: Lactate levels ranged from 1.1 to 21.0 mmol/l. Regression analysis of the hand-held analyser and laboratory showed a slope of 1.01, bias of -0.38 mmol/l, R(2) = 0.97 and mean error of 14.9 %. Reference POCI versus laboratory: slope = 1.07, bias = -0.29 mmol/l, R(2) = 0.98 and mean error of 6.4 %. Hand-held analyser versus reference POCI: slope = 0.90, bias = 0.09 mmol/l and R(2) = 0. 92. The hand-held analyser showed acceptable precision. CONCLUSION: The hand-held lactate analyser can reliably measure arterial blood lactate levels in critically ill patients.
OBJECTIVE: To compare a recently introduced hand-held lactate analyser to a reference point of care analyser (POCI) and the hospital laboratory in a critical care setting. SETTING: 10-bed surgical/medical intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 39 critically ill patients, 50 convenience measurement cycles consisting of three paired measurements at 30-min intervals were carried out with a hand-held analyser, reference POCI and hospital laboratory using arterial blood samples. Duplicate measurements with the hand-held analyser were done in 129 blood samples. RESULTS:Lactate levels ranged from 1.1 to 21.0 mmol/l. Regression analysis of the hand-held analyser and laboratory showed a slope of 1.01, bias of -0.38 mmol/l, R(2) = 0.97 and mean error of 14.9 %. Reference POCI versus laboratory: slope = 1.07, bias = -0.29 mmol/l, R(2) = 0.98 and mean error of 6.4 %. Hand-held analyser versus reference POCI: slope = 0.90, bias = 0.09 mmol/l and R(2) = 0. 92. The hand-held analyser showed acceptable precision. CONCLUSION: The hand-held lactate analyser can reliably measure arterial blood lactate levels in critically ill patients.
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Mitchell Levy; Peter J D Andrews; Jean Chastre; Leonard D Hudson; Constantine Manthous; G Umberto Meduri; Rui P Moreno; Christian Putensen; Thomas Stewart; Antoni Torres Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Zachary D W Dezman; Angela C Comer; Gordon S Smith; Mayur Narayan; Thomas M Scalea; Jon Mark Hirshon Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Sikhulile Moyo; Hermann Bussmann; Phibeon Mangwendeza; Priti Dusara; Tendani Gaolathe; Madisa Mine; Rosemary Musonda; Erik van Widenfelt; Vladimir Novitsky; Joseph Makhema; Richard G Marlink; Max Essex; C William Wester Journal: J Antivir Antiretrovir Date: 2011-09-20
Authors: Tim C Jansen; Jasper van Bommel; Paul G Mulder; Johannes H Rommes; Selma J M Schieveld; Jan Bakker Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 9.097