Literature DB >> 10501749

Comparison of systemic and regional effects of dobutamine and dopexamine in norepinephrine-treated septic shock.

B Levy1, L Nace, P E Bollaert, B Dousset, J P Mallie, A Larcan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of dobutamine and dopexamine on systemic hemodynamics, lactate metabolism, renal function and the intramucosal-arterial PCO(2) gap in norepinephrine-treated septic shock.
DESIGN: A prospective, interventional, randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Adult medical/surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: After volume resuscitation, 24 patients were treated with norepinephrine alone titrated to obtain a mean arterial pressure of 75 mmHg and a cardiac index greater than 3. 5 l/min(-1). m(-2).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive an infusion of dobutamine (n = 12) (5 microg/kg per min) or dopexamine (n = 12) (1 microg/kg per min).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline measurements included: hemodynamic parameters, renal parameters (diuresis, creatinine clearance and urinary sodium excretion), gastric mucosal-arterial PCO(2) gap, arterial and mixed venous gases and arterial lactate and pyruvate levels. These measurements were repeated after 1 (H(1)), 4 (H(4)) and 24 (H(24)) h. No difference was found between dobutamine and dopexamine among H(0) and H(1), H(4) and H(24) values for hemodynamics. Dobutamine and dopexamine at low doses had no significant effect on mean arterial pressure, heart rate, cardiac index, oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. No patients developed arrhythmia or electrocardiographic signs of myocardial ischemia. After 4 and 24 h lactate concentration decreased in the dobutamine group from 2.4 +/- 1 mmol/l to 1.7 +/- 0. 7 mmol/l and 1.5 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, respectively, while it increased in the dopexamine group from 2.3 +/- 1 mmol/l to 2.7 +/- 1 mmol/l after 4 h and returned to baseline values after 24 h (2.2 +/- 0.6). After 24 h the lactate/pyruvate ratio decreased in the dobutamine group from 15 +/- 5 to 12 +/- 3 (p < 0.05) while it was unchanged in the dopexamine group (from 16 +/- 6 to 17 +/- 4). Arterial pH increased in the dobutamine group from 7.35 +/- 0.05 to 7.38 +/- 0.07 (p < 0. 05) while it was unchanged in the dopexamine group (from 7.34 +/- 0. 01 to 7.35 +/- 0.10). The PCO(2) gap decreased after 1 and 4 h in both the dobutamine and dopexamine groups (p < 0.05 with respect to baseline). When looking at individual responses, however, patients from both groups exhibited an increased gastric PCO(2) gap. No difference was found between dobutamine and dopexamine for renal parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: In norepinephrine-treated septic shock, low doses of neither dobutamine nor dopexamine caused significant effects on systemic hemodynamics and renal function and both dobutamine and dopexamine inconsistently improved the PCO(2) gap. The present results support the need for individual measurement of the effects of catecholamine on the PCO(2) gap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10501749     DOI: 10.1007/s001340050986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  9 in total

1.  Effects of levosimendan on systemic and regional hemodynamics in septic myocardial depression.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Stefano De Castro; Jean-Louis Teboul; Mervyn Singer; Monica Rocco; Giorgio Conti; Leonardo De Luca; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Alessandra Orecchioni; Natesa G Pandian; Paolo Pietropaoli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Vasopressors for hypotensive shock.

Authors:  Gunnar Gamper; Christof Havel; Jasmin Arrich; Heidrun Losert; Nathan Leon Pace; Marcus Müllner; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-15

3.  Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling Approach to Predict the Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Septic Patients.

Authors:  Christian Radke; Dagmar Horn; Christian Lanckohr; Björn Ellger; Michaela Meyer; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Levosimendan for resuscitating the microcirculation in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Abele Donati; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian Rehberg; Matthias Lange; Alessandra Orecchioni; Valeria Cecchini; Giovanni Landoni; Paolo Pelaia; Paolo Pietropaoli; Hugo Van Aken; Jean-Louis Teboul; Can Ince; Martin Westphal
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Dopexamine and norepinephrine versus epinephrine on gastric perfusion in patients with septic shock: a randomized study [NCT00134212].

Authors:  Philippe Seguin; Bruno Laviolle; Patrick Guinet; Isabelle Morel; Yannick Mallédant; Eric Bellissant
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Gastric tonometry guided therapy in critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Wei Xuan; Ping Yin; Linlin Wang; Xiaodan Wu; Qingping Wu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Inodilators in septic shock: should these be used?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Luis E Calderón-Tapia
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

8.  In-hospital mortality following treatment with red blood cell transfusion or inotropic therapy during early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: a retrospective propensity-adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Dustin G Mark; John W Morehouse; Yun-Yi Hung; Mamata V Kene; Andrew R Elms; Vincent Liu; Dustin W Ballard; David R Vinson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  The spectrum of cardiovascular effects of dobutamine - from healthy subjects to septic shock patients.

Authors:  Arnaldo Dubin; Bernardo Lattanzio; Luis Gatti
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.