| Literature DB >> 10501583 |
L Ferrer1, J Alberola, M Queralt, P Brazís, R Rabanal, J Llenas, A Puigdemont.
Abstract
Forty atopic dogs were studied for 28 days after the oral administration of four randomised treatments: (A) arofylline (1 mg/kg) twice daily for four weeks; (B) prednisone (0.5 mg/kg) twice daily for the first week, once a day during the second week and every 48 hours for the remaining two weeks; (C) prednisone following the same protocol but at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg; or (D) arofylline (1 mg/kg) twice daily for four weeks plus prednisone (0.25 mg/kg) following the same protocol as in (B) and (C). The degree of pruritus and skin lesions and the side effects were evaluated and graded from 0 to 3 before and weekly during the treatments. In all cases there was a progressive clinical improvement in the clinical signs, with no statistical differences among the four treatments. However, many of the dogs treated with arofylline vomited and had adverse gastrointestinal signs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1999 PMID: 10501583 DOI: 10.1136/vr.145.7.191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Rec ISSN: 0042-4900 Impact factor: 2.695