Literature DB >> 10499005

Control' of reflexive and voluntary saccades in the gap effect.

G L Craig1, L B Stelmach, W J Tam.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined whether voluntary and reflexive saccades shared a common fixation disengagement mechanism. Participants were required to perform a variety of tasks, each requiring a different level of information processing of the display prior to execution of the saccade. In Experiment 1, participants executed either a prosaccade or an antisaccade upon detecting a stimulus array. In Experiment 2, participants executed a prosaccade to a stimulus array only if the array contained a target item. The target could be a line (easy search) or a digit (difficult search). The critical manipulation in both experiments was the relative timing between the removal of the fixation stimulus and the onset of the stimulus array. In both experiments, it was found that saccadic latencies were shortest when the fixation stimulus was removed before the onset of the stimulus array--a gap effect. It was concluded that reflexive and voluntary saccades share a common fixation disengagement mechanism that is largely independent of higher level cognitive processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10499005     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  2 in total

1.  Strategic modulation of the fixation-offset effect: dissociable effects of target probability on prosaccades and antisaccades.

Authors:  Leon Gmeindl; Andrew Rontal; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Myriam W G Vandenbroucke; Jon Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.