Literature DB >> 10497675

Current indications for open stone surgery in Singapore.

F Y Sy1, M Y Wong, K T Foo.   

Abstract

A 3-year retrospective study (January 1995 to December 1997) of all treatment modalities for urinary stone disease done in the Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital was documented, and open stone surgery identified. Patient's characteristics, stone burden, surgical factors, indications and outcome were reviewed for each patient. Of the 2651 procedures performed for urinary stone disease, the majority had extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [78% (n = 2075)], while 11% (n = 298) had percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and 9% (n = 228) ureteroscopy. Open stone surgery rate was 2% (n = 50) which included 16 anatrophic nephrolithotomies, 5 pyelolithotomies, 18 ureterolithotomies and 11 nephrectomies. There were 28 males and 22 females varying in age from 26 to 63 years (mean 48 years). The most common indications for open stone surgery were complex stone burden [38% (n = 19)], failure of minimally invasive modalities [16% (n = 8)], non-functioning kidneys [20% (n = 10)], concurrent open surgery [8% (n = 4)], co-morbid medical condition [4% (n = 2)], patient preference for open procedure [8% (n = 4)], anatomic abnormality [4% (n = 2)] and obesity [2% (n = 1)]. Stone free rate of 90% was achieved, morbidity of 8% (n = 4) mostly wound infections and a pneumothorax. Majority of patients with urinary tract calculi can be treated with less invasive modalities. Complex stone burden, failure of less invasive modalities, non-functioning kidney, concurrent open surgery, co-morbid medical problems, patients' preference, anatomic abnormality and obesity are factors to be considered in a small cohort of patients who may still benefit from treatment using open surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10497675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singap        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  5 in total

1.  The (soon forgotten) art of open stone surgery: to train or not to train?

Authors:  Noor N P Buchholz; Andrew Hitchings; Stephanos Albanis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Panlithiasis of the urinary tract: a case for open lithotomy in the modern era.

Authors:  Panagiotis Christopoulos; Goran Fryad; Andreas Bourdoumis; Georgios Papadopoulos; Stefanos Kachrilas; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Maneesh Sinha; K R John; K N Chacko; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01

Review 4.  The role of open stone surgery.

Authors:  Tamer El-Husseiny; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-05-02

Review 5.  From 'stone cutting' to high-technology methods: The changing face of stone surgery.

Authors:  Noor Buchholz; Mohammed Elfatih Ali Elhowairis; Christian Bach; Konstantinos Moraitis; Junaid Masood
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-05-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.