R J Mullins1, N C Mann. 1. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, Portland 97201-3098, USA. mullinsr@ohsu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review published evidence regarding the effectiveness of trauma systems by using population-based data. DESIGN: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature assessing the influence of trauma system implementation on the outcome of all injured patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature available in MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, and CINHAL was reviewed for studies that use population-based data to assess the benefit of trauma system development. Studies were included that assessed trauma systems in North America and used a comparison or control group in the analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Published evidence, reported for eight of the nine trauma systems evaluated, demonstrates improved outcomes, principally measured as hospital survival. Improvement occurred after the trauma system or some component of a trauma system (e.g., sophisticated prehospital care) was established. CONCLUSION: Population-based evidence supports a 15 to 20% improved survival rate among seriously injured patients with trauma system implementation. Future study is required to determine whether trauma systems improve the outcome of all injured patients, not just high-risk subsets of the population.
OBJECTIVE: To review published evidence regarding the effectiveness of trauma systems by using population-based data. DESIGN: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature assessing the influence of trauma system implementation on the outcome of all injured patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature available in MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, and CINHAL was reviewed for studies that use population-based data to assess the benefit of trauma system development. Studies were included that assessed trauma systems in North America and used a comparison or control group in the analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Published evidence, reported for eight of the nine trauma systems evaluated, demonstrates improved outcomes, principally measured as hospital survival. Improvement occurred after the trauma system or some component of a trauma system (e.g., sophisticated prehospital care) was established. CONCLUSION: Population-based evidence supports a 15 to 20% improved survival rate among seriously injured patients with trauma system implementation. Future study is required to determine whether trauma systems improve the outcome of all injured patients, not just high-risk subsets of the population.
Authors: Craig D Newgard; Dana Zive; James F Holmes; Eileen M Bulger; Kristan Staudenmayer; Michael Liao; Thomas Rea; Renee Y Hsia; N Ewen Wang; Ross Fleischman; Jonathan Jui; N Clay Mann; Jason S Haukoos; Karl A Sporer; K Dean Gubler; Jerris R Hedges Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Yoko Nakamura; Mohamud Daya; Eileen M Bulger; Martin Schreiber; Robert Mackersie; Renee Y Hsia; N Clay Mann; James F Holmes; Kristan Staudenmayer; Zachary Sturges; Michael Liao; Jason Haukoos; Nathan Kuppermann; Erik D Barton; Craig D Newgard Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Craig D Newgard; N Clay Mann; Renee Y Hsia; Eileen M Bulger; O John Ma; Kristan Staudenmayer; Jason S Haukoos; Ritu Sahni; Nathan Kuppermann Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: David P Mooney; Ivan M Gutierrez; Qiaoli Chen; Peter W Forbes; David Zurakowski Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 1.827