Literature DB >> 10496434

Maintenance of sinus rhythm with oral d,l-sotalol therapy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. d,l-Sotalol Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Study Group.

D G Benditt1, J H Williams, J Jin, T F Deering, R Zucker, K Browne, P Chang-Sing, B N Singh.   

Abstract

Currently d,l-sotalol is widely used to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter, although a randomized dose-response study has not previously been conducted to guide therapy for this indication. This study summarizes findings of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the efficacy, safety, and dose-response relation of 3 fixed doses of d,l-sotalol (80, 120, and 160 mg twice daily) for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in 253 patients with atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. All patients were in sinus rhythm at randomization. Treatment (69 patients on placebo, 59 on 80 mg, 63 on 120 mg, and 62 on 160 mg given twice daily) was continued for 12 months or until documented recurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring was used to detect symptomatic recurrences. Demographic characteristics were not different in the 4 groups. Structural heart disease was present in 57% of patients. Patients with a history of heart failure were excluded. The time from randomization to symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence was significantly longer in the 2 higher d,l-sotalol dose groups than in the placebo group. The median times to recurrence were 27, 106, 229, and 175 days for the placebo, 80, 120, and 160 mg groups, respectively. There were no deaths or cases of torsade de pointes, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation reported. Thus, d,l-sotalol appeared to be both safe and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Further, the 120-mg twice daily dose appeared to provide the most favorable benefit and/or risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10496434     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00275-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  24 in total

Review 1.  Computational approaches to structural and functional analysis of plastocyanin and other blue copper proteins.

Authors:  F De Rienzo; R R Gabdoulline; R C Wade; M Sola; M C Menziani
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Recent developments in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Bilal Iqbal; Anil K Taneja; Gregory Y H Lip; Marcus Flather
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-29

Review 3.  [Atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  M G Hennersdorf; B E Strauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  2014 AATS guidelines for the prevention and management of perioperative atrial fibrillation and flutter for thoracic surgical procedures.

Authors:  Gyorgy Frendl; Alissa C Sodickson; Mina K Chung; Albert L Waldo; Bernard J Gersh; James E Tisdale; Hugh Calkins; Sary Aranki; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Stephen Cassivi; Sidney C Smith; Dawood Darbar; Jon O Wee; Thomas K Waddell; David Amar; Dale Adler
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  What niche will newer class III antiarrhythmic drugs occupy?

Authors:  B N Singh; J S Sarma
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Current management of symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  K S Channer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Rate versus rhythm control strategies for AF.

Authors:  Brian Olshansky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-10

Review 9.  A benefit-risk assessment of class III antiarrhythmic agents.

Authors:  Bente Brendorp; Oledyg Pedersen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Naji Sahebzadah; Lars Køber
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Pharmacologic management of atrial fibrillation in the elderly: rate control, rhythm control, and anticoagulation.

Authors:  Seth McClennen; Peter J Zimetbaum
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.