Literature DB >> 10495736

"Teach 1, do 1 ... better": superior communication skills in senior medical students serving as standardized patient--examiners for their junior peers.

V A Sasson1, B Blatt, G Kallenberg, M Delaney, F S White.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To see if senior medical students who had served as standardized patients (SP) demonstrated improvement in their own interpersonal communication skills.
METHOD: From George Washington School of Medicine's class of 1996, 154 fourth-year students took a clinical practice examination that used professional SPs. Within the preceding six months, 28 of these students had been SP-examiners in similar examinations for first- and second-year medical students. The professional SPs rated the fourth-year examinees using checklists that measured five dimensions of interpersonal communication skills. Four of these five dimensions were identical to those measured on the examinations for which the fourth-year students had served as SPs. Hypothesizing that the SP-experienced seniors would outscore their inexperienced classmates on those four dimensions, but not on the fifth, the authors analyzed the fourth-year students' scores. P values were computed by the F test from a two-way analysis of variance.
RESULTS: As predicted, the group with prior SP experience significantly outscored their inexperienced colleagues in each of the four expected dimensions of interpersonal communication skills, with p values ranging from .000 to .023. The score differential in these dimensions ranged from 3.8 to 11.8 percentage points. As further predicted, there was no significant difference between the scores of the two groups on the fifth dimension.
CONCLUSION: Compared with their inexperienced peers, senior medical students with prior SP experience consistently demonstrated superior scores when their own communication skills were tested in a similar manner. The U.S. Medical Licensing Examinations propose to incorporate SP clinical examinations; in response, medical schools will use more SP examinations in their own curricula. Such examinations are expensive when using professional standardized patients; the authors believe that an SP program using senior medical students will prove an attractive alternative. Such programs may have the added advantage of making better communicators of senior medical student teachers as well as the students they teach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10495736     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199908000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Measuring the competence of residents as teachers.

Authors:  Sondra Zabar; Kathleen Hanley; David L Stevens; Adina Kalet; Mark D Schwartz; Ellen Pearlman; Judy Brenner; Elizabeth K Kachur; Mack Lipkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Perceptions of medical school graduates and students regarding their academic preparation to teach.

Authors:  B W Henry; J G Haworth; P Hering
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph Plaksin; Joseph Nicholson; Sarita Kundrod; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet; Lisa Altshuler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  'It's the ultimate observer role…you're feeling and seeing what's happening to you': students' experiences of peer simulation.

Authors:  Shane A Pritchard; Narelle Dalwood; Jennifer L Keating; Debra Nestel; Maxine Te; Felicity Blackstock
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-10-29

5.  The Enhanced Brief Structured Observation Model: Efficiently Assess Trainee Competence and Provide Feedback.

Authors:  Scott Baumgartner; Dewesh Agrawal; Larrie Greenberg
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2021-05-05

6.  Physiotherapy students can be educated to portray realistic patient roles in simulation: a pragmatic observational study.

Authors:  Shane A Pritchard; Jennifer L Keating; Debra Nestel; Felicity C Blackstock
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.