Literature DB >> 10495074

Subicular place cells expand or contract their spatial firing pattern to fit the size of the environment in an open field but not in the presence of barriers: comparison with hippocampal place cells.

P E Sharp1.   

Abstract

Cells in the hippocampus and subiculum signal spatial location in fundamentally different ways. Specifically, hippocampal cells show environment-specific spatial patterns, whereas subicular cells show the same pattern in each environment. In this study, cell firing patterns were recorded in both a large square and in a smaller square located within the large square. For some groups, portions of the small square were left in place during exposure to the large square, thus forming partial barriers. Subicular cell patterns during exposure to the large square were expanded versions of those in the small square. Hippocampal cells were likely to change their pattern completely ("remap") during exposure. However, when the barriers were left in place, cells in both areas retained the same pattern while rats were in the small square, regardless of whether they also had access to the entire large square area. Thus, subicular cells can change the size of their spatial pattern to fit the environment but will not do so across barriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10495074     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.113.4.643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  14 in total

1.  Contrasting patterns of receptive field plasticity in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex: an adaptive filtering approach.

Authors:  Loren M Frank; Uri T Eden; Victor Solo; Matthew A Wilson; Emery N Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The subiculum: what it does, what it might do, and what neuroanatomy has yet to tell us.

Authors:  Shane O'Mara
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Origin and role of path integration in the cognitive representations of the hippocampus: computational insights into open questions.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Subiculum neurons map the current axis of travel.

Authors:  Jacob M Olson; Kanyanat Tongprasearth; Douglas A Nitz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Neural Firing Patterns Are More Schematic and Less Sensitive to Changes in Background Visual Scenes in the Subiculum than in the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Hyun-Woo Lee; Su-Min Lee; Inah Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Exposure to complex environments results in more sparse representations of space in the hippocampus.

Authors:  David K Bilkey; Kirsten R Cheyne; Michael J Eckert; Xiaodong Lu; Shoaib Chowdhury; Paul F Worley; James E Crandall; Wickliffe C Abraham
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Inducible and selective erasure of memories in the mouse brain via chemical-genetic manipulation.

Authors:  Xiaohua Cao; Huimin Wang; Bing Mei; Shuming An; Liang Yin; L Phillip Wang; Joe Z Tsien
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Influence of boundary removal on the spatial representations of the medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Theta-modulated place-by-direction cells in the hippocampal formation in the rat.

Authors:  Francesca Cacucci; Colin Lever; Thomas J Wills; Neil Burgess; John O'Keefe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Boundary vector cells in the subiculum of the hippocampal formation.

Authors:  Colin Lever; Stephen Burton; Ali Jeewajee; John O'Keefe; Neil Burgess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.