Literature DB >> 10495073

Clodronate: a review of its use in breast cancer.

M Hurst1, S Noble.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Like other members of its class, the bisphosphonate clodronate (clodronic acid) inhibits bone resorption. The efficacy of oral clodronate 1600 mg/day in reducing the incidence of skeletal complications and metastasis development has been assessed in several clinical trials in patients with breast cancer. Long term use of oral clodronate significantly reduced the total cumulative incidence of skeletal events (including fractures, hypercalcaemia, and the need for radiotherapy for bone pain) compared with that in placebo recipients in 2 randomised double-blind placebo-controlled studies, each involving >100 patients. Significant differences in favour of clodronate were also seen in the frequency of some individual skeletal events in 1 trial. A nonblind trial in 302 patients considered to be at high risk of developing metastases found that, at a 3-year follow-up, significantly fewer patients who received clodronate for 2 years developed skeletal metastases than those in a control group. Clodronate recipients were also significantly less likely than controls to develop visceral metastases, and had significantly higher survival rates. A smaller double-blind placebo-controlled study in women with recurrent breast cancer found that clodronate significantly decreased the total number of new skeletal metastases, but not the number of patients who developed them. In a nonblind trial in 299 patients with node-positive breast cancer, however, the incidence of skeletal metastases did not differ significantly between patients who received clodronate for 3 years and those in a control group. In addition, clodronate recipients had a significantly greater incidence of nonskeletal metastases (local and visceral), and significantly lower survival rates. Intravenous or oral clodronate has been well tolerated in clinical trials. The most common adverse effects reported were mild gastrointestinal disturbances such as nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. All these events were transient, and usually resolved without stopping treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Clodronate is a well tolerated bisphosphonate, available in both oral and intravenous forms, that significantly reduces the incidence of skeletal complications associated with breast cancer. Further research is needed to establish more clearly its efficacy in reducing metastasis development, to assess its efficacy compared with other bisphosphonates, and to determine which patients will benefit most from treatment. Currently, clodronate is probably most effective in the treatment and prevention of general skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10495073     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199915020-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  96 in total

1.  Bisphosphonates as anticancer drugs.

Authors:  G R Mundy; T Yoneda
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Clodronate: the potential for the future.

Authors:  T Powles
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Comparison of three intravenous bisphosphonates in cancer-associated hypercalcaemia.

Authors:  S H Ralston; S J Gallacher; U Patel; F J Dryburgh; W D Fraser; R A Cowan; I T Boyle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-11-18       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Bisphosphonate risedronate prevents bone loss in women with artificial menopause due to chemotherapy of breast cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  P D Delmas; R Balena; E Confravreux; C Hardouin; P Hardy; A Bremond
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Should bisphosphonates be part of the standard therapy of patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases from other cancers? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  D J Bloomfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Pharmacokinetics of clodronate in renal failure.

Authors:  H Saha; P Castren-Kortekangas; S Ojanen; A Juhakoski; J Tuominen; O Tokola; A Pasternack
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Strontium 89 therapy for the palliation of pain due to osseous metastases.

Authors:  R G Robinson; D F Preston; M Schiefelbein; K G Baxter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-08-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Intravenous clodronate for the treatment of hypercalcaemia in breast cancer patients with bone metastases--a prospective randomised placebo-controlled multicentre study.

Authors:  S Rotstein; U Glas; M Eriksson; P Pfeiffer; J Hansen; J Söderqvist; U Bandmann; S Strid
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  A double-blind, crossover trial of intravenous clodronate in metastatic bone pain.

Authors:  D S Ernst; R N MacDonald; A H Paterson; J Jensen; P Brasher; E Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Etidronate versus clodronate in the prevention of postovariectomy bone loss. An experimental study in rats.

Authors:  H Rico; C Amo; M Revilla; I Arribas; J González-Riola; L F Villa; M Rodriguez-Puyol
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.473

View more
  5 in total

1.  Zoledronic acid(ZOMETA): a significant improvement in the bone metastases.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Nagy
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Clodronate : a review of its use in the prevention of bone metastases and the management of skeletal complications associated with bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Toni M Dando; Lynda R Wiseman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Clinical and economic issues in the treatment of advanced breast cancer with bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Nicola Lucio Liberato; Monia Marchetti; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Metastatic bone pain: treatment options with an emphasis on bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Roger von Moos; Florian Strasser; Silke Gillessen; Kathrin Zaugg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Nanotechnology in the targeted drug delivery for bone diseases and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Wenyi Gu; Chengtie Wu; Jiezhong Chen; Yin Xiao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-06-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.