Literature DB >> 10493806

Control of coenzyme binding to horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase.

L A LeBrun1, B V Plapp.   

Abstract

The rate of association of NAD(+) with wild-type horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) is maximal at pH values between pK values of about 7 and 9, and the rate of NADH association is maximal at a pH below a pK of 9. The catalytic zinc-bound water, His-51 (which interacts with the 2'- and 3'-hydroxyl groups of the nicotinamide ribose of the coenzyme in the proton relay system), and Lys-228 (which interacts with the adenosine 3'-hydroxyl group and the pyrophosphate of the coenzyme) may be responsible for the observed pK values. In this study, the Lys228Arg, His51Gln, and Lys228Arg/His51Gln (to isolate the effect of the catalytic zinc-bound water) mutations were used to test the roles of the residues in coenzyme binding. The steady state kinetic constants at pH 8 for the His51Gln enzyme are similar to those for wild-type ADH. The Lys228Arg and Lys228Arg/His51Gln substitutions decrease the affinity for the coenzymes up to 16-fold, probably due to altered interactions with the arginine at position 228. As determined by transient kinetics, the rate constant for association of NAD(+) with the mutated enzymes no longer decreases at high pH. The pH profile for the Lys228Arg enzyme retains the pK value near 7. The His51Gln and Lys228Arg/His51Gln substitutions significantly decrease the rate constants for NAD(+) association, and the pH dependencies show that these enzymes bind NAD(+) most rapidly at a pH above pK values of 8. 0 and 9.0, respectively. It appears that the pK of 7 in the wild-type enzyme is shifted up by the H51Q substitutions, and the resulting pH dependence is due to the deprotonation of the catalytic zinc-bound water. Kinetic simulations suggest that isomerization of the enzyme-NAD(+) complex is substantially altered by the mutations. In contrast, the pH dependencies for NADH association with His51Gln, Lys228Arg, and Lys228Arg/His51Gln enzymes were the same as for wild-type ADH, suggesting that the binding of NAD(+) and the binding of NADH are controlled differently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10493806     DOI: 10.1021/bi991306p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  8 in total

1.  Atomic-resolution structures of horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase with NAD(+) and fluoroalcohols define strained Michaelis complexes.

Authors:  Bryce V Plapp; S Ramaswamy
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Origins of the high catalytic activity of human alcohol dehydrogenase 4 studied with horse liver A317C alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Timothy J Herdendorf; Bryce V Plapp
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.192

3.  Heterologous expression and characterization of an alcohol dehydrogenase from the archeon Thermoplasma acidophilum.

Authors:  Erika Nahomy Marino-Marmolejo; Antonio De León-Rodríguez; Ana Paulina Barba de la Rosa; Leticia Santos
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Human deoxyhypusine synthase: interrelationship between binding of NAD and substrates.

Authors:  C H Lee; M H Park
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Bradykinetic alcohol dehydrogenases make yeast fitter for growth in the presence of allyl alcohol.

Authors:  Bryce V Plapp; Ann Ting-I Lee; Aditi Khanna; John M Pryor
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 6.  Conformational changes and catalysis by alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Bryce V Plapp
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  Yeast alcohol dehydrogenase structure and catalysis.

Authors:  Savarimuthu Baskar Raj; S Ramaswamy; Bryce V Plapp
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Hierarchically encapsulating enzymes with multi-shelled metal-organic frameworks for tandem biocatalytic reactions.

Authors:  Tiantian Man; Caixia Xu; Xiao-Yuan Liu; Dan Li; Chia-Kuang Tsung; Hao Pei; Ying Wan; Li Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 17.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.