Literature DB >> 10493489

Occult esophageal adenocarcinoma: extent of disease and implications for effective therapy.

J J Nigro1, J A Hagen, T R DeMeester, S R DeMeester, J Theisen, J H Peters, M Kiyabu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The need for esophagectomy in patients with Barrett's esophagus, with no endoscopically visible lesion, and a biopsy showing high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma has been questioned. Recently, endoscopic techniques to ablate the neoplastic mucosa have been encouraged. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of disease present in patients with clinically occult esophageal adenocarcinoma to define the magnitude of therapy required to achieve cure.
METHODS: Thirty-three patients with high-grade dysplasia (23 patients) or adenocarcinoma (10 patients) and no endoscopically visible lesion underwent repeat endoscopy and systematic biopsy followed by esophagectomy. The surgical specimens were analyzed to determine the biopsy error rate in detecting occult adenocarcinoma. In those with cancer, the depth of wall penetration and the presence of lymph node metastases on conventional histology and immunohistochemistry staining was determined. The findings were compared with those in 12 patients (1 with high-grade dysplasia, 11 with adenocarcinoma) who had visible lesions on endoscopy.
RESULTS: The biopsy error rate for detecting occult adenocarcinoma was 43%. Of 25 patients with cancer and no visible lesion, the cancer was limited to the mucosa in 22 (88%) and to the submucosa in 3 (12%). After en bloc esophagectomy, one patient without a visible lesion had a single node metastasis on conventional histology. No additional node metastases were identified on immunohistochemistry. The 5-year survival rate after esophagectomy was 90%. Patients with endoscopically visible lesions were significantly more likely to have invasion beyond the mucosa (9/12 vs. 3/25, p = 0.01) and involvement of lymph nodes (5/9 vs. 1/10, p = 0.057).
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy with systematic biopsy cannot reliably exclude the presence of occult adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. The lack of an endoscopically visible lesion does not preclude cancer invasion beyond the muscularis mucosae, cautioning against the use of mucosal ablative procedures. The rarity of lymph node metastases in these patients encourages a more limited resection with greater emphasis on improved alimentary function (esophageal stripping with vagal nerve preservation) to provide a quality of life compatible with the excellent 5-year survival rate of 90%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10493489      PMCID: PMC1420887          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

1.  Photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus: follow-up in 100 patients.

Authors:  B F Overholt; M Panjehpour; J M Haydek
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Esophagectomy without thoracotomy with vagal preservation.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; Y Ono; H Udagawa; Y Kajiyama
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Esophageal stripping with preservation of the vagus nerve.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; T Kawamura; Y Ono
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1982 Apr-Jun

4.  Esophagectomy without thoracotomy.

Authors:  M B Orringer; H Sloan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Barrett's esophagus: development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  W Hameeteman; G N Tytgat; H J Houthoff; J G van den Tweel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Outcome of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus in endoscopically surveyed and nonsurveyed patients.

Authors:  J H Peters; G W Clark; A P Ireland; P Chandrasoma; T C Smyrk; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Superiority of extended en bloc esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the lower esophagus and cardia.

Authors:  J A Hagen; J H Peters; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: standardized classification with provisional clinical applications.

Authors:  R H Riddell; H Goldman; D F Ransohoff; H D Appelman; C M Fenoglio; R C Haggitt; C Ahren; P Correa; S R Hamilton; B C Morson
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Comparative features of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas: recent changes in type and frequency.

Authors:  H H Wang; D A Antonioli; H Goldman
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  D S Levine; R C Haggitt; P L Blount; P S Rabinovitch; V W Rusch; B J Reid
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma: concepts in evolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N J Shaheen; J M Inadomi; B F Overholt; P Sharma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Esophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: When and how?

Authors:  Vani J A Konda; Mark K Ferguson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Extended endoscopic mucosal resection in the esophagus and hypopharynx: a new rigid device.

Authors:  Yves Jaquet; Raphaelle Pilloud; Pierre Grosjean; Alexandre Radu; Philippe Monnier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Expert pathology review and endoscopic mucosal resection alters the diagnosis of patients referred to undergo therapy for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Katie Ayers; Chanjuan Shi; Kay Washington; Patrick Yachimski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Accuracy of staging in early oesophageal cancer using high resolution endoscopy and high resolution endosonography: a comparative, prospective, and blinded trial.

Authors:  A May; E Günter; F Roth; L Gossner; M Stolte; M Vieth; C Ell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Surgical management of esophageal malignancy.

Authors:  Dennis Blom
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06

9.  Initial experience with new intraluminal devices for GERD, Barrett's esophagus, and obesity.

Authors:  Charles J Filipi; Rudolf J Stadlhuber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Preemptive surgery for premalignant foregut lesions.

Authors:  Rohit R Sharma; Mark J London; Laura L Magenta; Mitchell C Posner; Kevin K Roggin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.