Literature DB >> 10492836

Predictive smooth pursuit eye movements during identification of moving acuity targets.

S G Wells1, G R Barnes.   

Abstract

Repetitive, brief target ramp movements every few seconds lead to anticipatory acceleration before each ramp onset and anticipatory deceleration before ramp offset. We assessed whether identifying novel changes in the pursuit target would alter this pattern of anticipatory pursuit. Without target identification (TI), anticipatory acceleration increased when intervals between ramps were regular, rather than random. It increased further when, between ramps, the target was invisible rather than stationary and visible. Anticipatory deceleration increased when the target was expected to stop rather than disappear at ramp offset. For TI trials, the pursuit target changed briefly into a Landolt C acuity target that had to be identified. Compared to no TI, anticipatory acceleration decreased when a stationary C always appeared just before ramp onset. It increased when a moving C appeared just after ramp onset, but only when the target was invisible between ramps. Anticipatory deceleration was reduced when a moving C appeared just before ramp offset, but did not increase when a stationary C appeared just after ramp offset. The changes were significant, but of small magnitude, suggesting that predictive pursuit, especially with a visible target between ramps, cannot be greatly influenced by attempts to selectively improve acuity at a particular phase of the stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10492836     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00018-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Target selection for predictive smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  E Poliakoff; C J S Collins; G R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of previous target motion on anticipatory pursuit deceleration.

Authors:  C de Hemptinne; G R Barnes; M Missal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Predicting curvilinear target motion through an occlusion.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial consequences of bridging the saccadic gap.

Authors:  Kielan Yarrow; Louise Whiteley; John C Rothwell; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The use of non-motion-based cues to pre-programme the timing of predictive velocity reversal in human smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Christian Jarrett; Graham Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Predicting the duration of ocular pursuit in humans.

Authors:  G R Barnes; C J S Collins; L R Arnold
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Evidence for object permanence in the smooth-pursuit eye movements of monkeys.

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; I-Han Chou; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Quantitative differences in smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  M R Burke; G R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.