Literature DB >> 10492824

Adaptation and the temporal delay filter of fly motion detectors.

R A Harris1, D C O'Carroll, S B Laughlin.   

Abstract

Recent accounts attribute motion adaptation to a shortening of the delay filter in elementary motion detectors (EMDs). Using computer modelling and recordings from HS neurons in the drone-fly Eristalis tenax, we present evidence that challenges this theory. (i) Previous evidence for a change in the delay filter comes from 'image step' (or 'velocity impulse') experiments. We note a large discrepancy between the temporal frequency tuning predicted from these experiments and the observed tuning of motion sensitive cells. (ii) The results of image step experiments are highly sensitive to the experimental method used. (iii) An apparent motion stimulus reveals a much shorter EMD delay than suggested by previous 'image step' experiments. This short delay agrees with the observed temporal frequency sensitivity of the unadapted cell. (iv) A key prediction of a shortening delay filter is that the temporal frequency optimum of the cell should show a large shift to higher temporal frequencies after motion adaptation. We show little change in the temporal or spatial frequency (and hence velocity) optima following adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10492824     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00297-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

Review 1.  Natural patterns of neural activity: how physiological mechanisms are orchestrated to cope with real life.

Authors:  Rafael Kurtz; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Noise, not stimulus entropy, determines neural information rate.

Authors:  Alexander Borst
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  On the computations analyzing natural optic flow: quantitative model analysis of the blowfly motion vision pathway.

Authors:  J P Lindemann; R Kern; J H van Hateren; H Ritter; M Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Adaptation accentuates responses of fly motion-sensitive visual neurons to sudden stimulus changes.

Authors:  Rafael Kurtz; Martin Egelhaaf; Hanno Gerd Meyer; Roland Kern
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The many facets of adaptation in fly visual motion processing.

Authors:  Rafael Kurtz
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009

6.  Scalable co-optimization of morphology and control in embodied machines.

Authors:  Nick Cheney; Josh Bongard; Vytas SunSpiral; Hod Lipson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Differential Tuning to Visual Motion Allows Robust Encoding of Optic Flow in the Dragonfly.

Authors:  Bernard J E Evans; David C O'Carroll; Joseph M Fabian; Steven D Wiederman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Defining the computational structure of the motion detector in Drosophila.

Authors:  Damon A Clark; Limor Bursztyn; Mark A Horowitz; Mark J Schnitzer; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Direct Measurement of Correlation Responses in Drosophila Elementary Motion Detectors Reveals Fast Timescale Tuning.

Authors:  Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas; Juyue Chen; Matthew S Creamer; Omer Mano; Holly B Mandel; Catherine A Matulis; Joseph Pottackal; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Robust models for optic flow coding in natural scenes inspired by insect biology.

Authors:  Russell S A Brinkworth; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.