Literature DB >> 10492372

A comparison of deconvolution and the Patlak-Rutland plot in renography analysis.

J S Fleming1, P M Kemp.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Deconvolution and the Patlak-Rutland plot are two of the most commonly used methods for analyzing dynamic radionuclide renography. Both methods allow estimation of absolute and relative renal uptake of radiopharmaceutical and of its rate of transit through the kidney.
METHODS: A theoretical comparison of uptake assessment by both techniques is made and a mathematical derivation of the relationship between mean transit time (MTT) and renal outflow efficiency (ROE) is presented. The validity of these theoretical findings was tested in a series of 120 renograms obtained using 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3).
RESULTS: The estimates of renal uptake obtained are theoretically equivalent. The renogram measurements confirmed this, because there was no significant systematic difference in relative counts obtained by the two methods. Absolute counts were significantly higher for the deconvolution measurements, but only by 2.0%. The SDs of the differences between the two techniques, expressed as a percentage of the mean, were 1.7% and 5.4% for relative and absolute counts, respectively. There was an inverse monotonic relationship between MTT and ROE. ROE evaluated at a particular time was shown to depend on absolute renal function. Measured values of MTT and ROE were consistent with the theoretical prediction.
CONCLUSION: The two approaches to renogram analysis provide consistent parameters for both uptake and transit evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10492372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  8 in total

Review 1.  Applications of imaging technology in radiation research.

Authors:  MingDe Lin; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  A simple method for determining split renal function from dynamic (99m)Tc-MAG3 scintigraphic data.

Authors:  Michal J Wesolowski; Gary R Conrad; Martin Šámal; Gage Watson; Surajith N Wanasundara; Paul Babyn; Carl A Wesolowski
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  99mTc-MAG3 scintigraphy for the longitudinal follow-up of kidney function in a mouse model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Tanja Herrler; Hao Wang; Anne Tischer; Peter Bartenstein; Karl-Walter Jauch; Markus Guba; Markus Diemling; Cyril Nimmon; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  Estimation of Response Functions Based on Variational Bayes Algorithm in Dynamic Images Sequences.

Authors:  Bowei Shan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Assessment of the kidney function parameters split function, mean transit time, and outflow efficiency using dynamic FDG-PET/MRI in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Barbara K Geist; Pascal Baltzer; Barbara Fueger; Martina Hamboeck; Thomas Nakuz; Laszlo Papp; Sazan Rasul; Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar; Marcus Hacker; Anton Staudenherz
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2019-02-15

6.  A comparison of deconvolution and the Rutland-Patlak plot in parenchymal renal uptake rate.

Authors:  Issa A Al-Shakhrah
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-07

7.  Response evaluation of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using 18F-FDG PET/MRI.

Authors:  Sazan Rasul; Barbara Katharina Geist; Helmut Brath; Pascal Baltzer; Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar; Verena Pichler; Markus Mitterhauser; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-03

8.  Deconvolution of Tc-99m-Mercaptoacetyltriglycine Renograms with the Concomitant Use of a Sparse Legendre Polynomial Representation and the Moore-Penrose Pseudo-inverse.

Authors:  Michel Destine; François-Xavier Hanin; Isabelle Mathieu; Bernard Willemart; Alain Seret
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2022-02-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.