[Chronic comorbidity and homogeneity in diagnostic related groups].

OBJECTIVE: [corrected] One of the ways to compare the efficiency of different hospitals and services is to evaluate Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs), with the hypothesis that patients in the same RDG will present homogeneous behavior with respect to length of stay. The object of this study was to evaluate in the context os the National Health System the internal variability of specific DRGs in terms of the patients' comorbidity.
METHODS: On the basis of various comorbidity scores measured with the Charlson index (ChI), we analyzed length of stay, inhospital mortality and emergency readmissions at 30 and 365 days in 106.673 hospitalizations (excluding subjects younger than 17 years of age, and obstetrics and psychiatric patients) in 12 hospitals, and in 17 DRGs selected on the basis of their greater frequency and comorbidity.
RESULTS: In the aggregated analysis, length of stay (from 8.5 days in patients with no comorbidity to 17.0 days in patients with scores higher than 4) and inhospital mortality rates (from 3.7% in patients with no comorbidity to 17.6% in patients with highest score) increased significantly with each level of the Charlson index. The readmission rate at 30 days rose from 4.7% to 10.9% also in step with increases in comorbidity scores. Readmissions at one year varied from 14.8% in patients with scores of 0 to 35.2% in patients with scores of 3-4, and dropped to 27.9% in patients with scores higher than 4. When analysing different DRGs, 8 of the 17 groups studied showed a significantly higher length of stay with increased comorbidity scores. Some DRGs also showed intra-group variability with respect to mortality and readmission, particularly at 365 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Some DRGs show significant internal variability in terms of comorbidity that may be generating a false worse evaluation of the efficiency of hospitals that treat patients with higher comorbidity.