Literature DB >> 10490154

Comparison of 0.25 mg and 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine for analgesia after Cesarean section.

T Yang1, T W Breen, D Archer, G Fick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine plus NSAIDs provides satisfactory analgesia post-Cesarean section with fewer side effects than 0.25 mg intrathecal morphine.
METHODS: Sixty women, scheduled for elective Cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, were randomized to receive either 0.1 mg or 0.25 mg intrathecal morphine combined with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% and 20 microg fentanyl. All patients received a 100 mg indomethacin suppository at the end of surgery and 500 mg naproxen p.o. b.i.d. was started the evening of surgery and continued until discharge. A blinded researcher recorded the pain, pruritus, and nausea scores, the time to first request for additional analgesics, a visual analogue scale (VAS) satisfaction score, and the use of additional opioids, antipruritics, and/or antiemetics.
RESULTS: Of the 60 patients enrolled, two were not included in the data analysis because of protocol violations leaving 30 patients in the 0.1 mg group and 28 in the 0.25 mg group. There were no differences in the VAS pain scores or the number of women requesting an opioid other than codeine between the two groups. The VAS pruritus scores in the 0.1 mg group were lower throughout the 24 hr (P < 0.001). Fewer women in the 0.1 mg group (4/30 vs 12/28) requested nalbuphine to treat itching (P = 0.018). Nausea scores were lower in the 0.1 mg group (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The use of 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine plus NSAIDs provides analgesia of similar quality to 0.25 mg but with fewer undesirable side effects following Cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10490154     DOI: 10.1007/BF03012975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neuraxial morphine and respiratory depression: finding the right balance.

Authors:  Pervez Sultan; Maria Cristina Gutierrez; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Cost comparison of intrathecal morphine to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the first 24 h post cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nitesh Patel; Ayesha Bryant; Kensi Duncan; Promil Kukreja; Mark F Powell
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Side Effects and Efficacy of Neuraxial Opioids in Pregnant Patients at Delivery: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Roshan Fernando
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Multimodal Analgesic Techniques in Patients Predicted to Have Severe Pain After Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Jessica L Booth; Lynnette C Harris; James C Eisenach; Peter H Pan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Analgesic Efficacy of Pfannenstiel Incision Infiltration with Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL for Caesarean Section.

Authors:  N K Nguyen; A Landais; A Barbaryan; M A M'barek; Y Benbaghdad; K McGee; P Lanba
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-07-27

6.  Does dexamethasone prevent subarachnoid meperidin-induced nausea, vomiting and pruritus after cesarean delivery?

Authors:  Nadia Banihashem; Bahman Hasannasab; Hakimeh Alereza
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-04

7.  Intrathecal nalbuphine as an adjuvant to subarachnoid block: What is the most effective dose?

Authors:  Arghya Mukherjee; Anirban Pal; Jitendra Agrawal; Amrita Mehrotra; Nidhi Dawar
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jul-Dec

8.  Opioid Sparing Anesthesia and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Joseph Leech; Kenneth Oswalt; Michelle A Tucci; Oscar A Alam Mendez; Bryan J Hierlmeier
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.