OBJECTIVE: To compare pharmacokinetic variables of enrofloxacin (ENR) after IV administration in mice, rats, rabbits, sheep, and cows and to perform allometric analysis of ENR. ANIMALS: 47 mice, 5 rats, 5 rabbits, 5 sheep, and 5 cows. PROCEDURE: Serially obtained plasma samples were assayed for ENR concentration, using high-performance liquid chromatography. In vitro plasma protein binding was determined by ultrafiltration. Plasma ENR concentration versus time curves were fitted by use of nonlinear least-squared regression analysis. Pharmacokinetic variables were correlated further with body weight. RESULTS: In all species studied, the best fit was obtained for a two-compartment open model; ENR half-life ranged from 89 minutes in mice to 169 minutes in cows. Volume of distribution was large in all species studied, with values ranging from 10.5 L/kg in mice to 1.5 L/kg in sheep. Body clearance ranged from 68.1 ml/min/kg for mice to 4.6 ml/min/kg for sheep. Unbound ENR was found to be (mean +/- SD) 58+/-2, 50+/-6, 50+/-2, 31+/-2, and 40+/-3% in plasma of mice, rats, rabbits, sheep, and cows, respectively. The only pharmacokinetic variables that could be correlated with body weight were elimination half-life, clearance, and volume of distribution. Allometric exponents denoting proportionality of half-life, body clearance, and volume of distribution with body weight were 0.06, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An allometric approach could provide a suitable method for determining a scale for ENR pharmacokinetics among various mammalian species. This would faciliatate the administration of appropriate doses of ENR to all animals.
OBJECTIVE: To compare pharmacokinetic variables of enrofloxacin (ENR) after IV administration in mice, rats, rabbits, sheep, and cows and to perform allometric analysis of ENR. ANIMALS: 47 mice, 5 rats, 5 rabbits, 5 sheep, and 5 cows. PROCEDURE: Serially obtained plasma samples were assayed for ENR concentration, using high-performance liquid chromatography. In vitro plasma protein binding was determined by ultrafiltration. Plasma ENR concentration versus time curves were fitted by use of nonlinear least-squared regression analysis. Pharmacokinetic variables were correlated further with body weight. RESULTS: In all species studied, the best fit was obtained for a two-compartment open model; ENR half-life ranged from 89 minutes in mice to 169 minutes in cows. Volume of distribution was large in all species studied, with values ranging from 10.5 L/kg in mice to 1.5 L/kg in sheep. Body clearance ranged from 68.1 ml/min/kg for mice to 4.6 ml/min/kg for sheep. Unbound ENR was found to be (mean +/- SD) 58+/-2, 50+/-6, 50+/-2, 31+/-2, and 40+/-3% in plasma of mice, rats, rabbits, sheep, and cows, respectively. The only pharmacokinetic variables that could be correlated with body weight were elimination half-life, clearance, and volume of distribution. Allometric exponents denoting proportionality of half-life, body clearance, and volume of distribution with body weight were 0.06, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An allometric approach could provide a suitable method for determining a scale for ENR pharmacokinetics among various mammalian species. This would faciliatate the administration of appropriate doses of ENR to all animals.
Authors: Andrea R Slate; Sheila Bandyopadhyay; Kevin P Francis; Mark G Papich; Brian Karolewski; Eldad A Hod; Kevin A Prestia Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Cristina López; Juan José García; Matilde Sierra; María José Diez; Claudia Pérez; Ana Maria Sahagún; Nélida Fernández Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Jiagui Li; Beatrice Claudi; Joseph Fanous; Natalia Chicherova; Francesca Romana Cianfanelli; Robert A A Campbell; Dirk Bumann Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Clarissa Leal Silva E Souza; Camila Dutra Barbosa; Hanna I L N Coelho; Manoel N Santos Júnior; Elaine Novaes Barbosa; Éllunny Chaves Queiroz; Mauro Fernandes Teles; Déborah Cruz Dos Santos; Rafaela Souza Bittencourt; Telma de Jesus Soares; Márcio Vasconcelos Oliveira; Jorge Timenetsky; Guilherme Barreto Campos; Lucas Miranda Marques Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 5.293