J D Piette1. 1. Center for Health Care Evaluation/HSR&D Field Program, Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, California, USA. piette@odd.stanford.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Using diabetes as a prototype, we examined whether automated telephone disease management (ATDM) calls can improve chronically ill patients' access to self-care and dietary information. METHODS: Two-hundred-twenty-six English-speaking patients and 30 Spanish-speaking patients who were recruited from outpatient clinics received bi-weekly ATDM calls for 1 year, in which they were given the opportunity to access patient education messages. We compared the proportion of English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients who selected brief self-care tips and interactive dietary education modules. Within each language group, we examined trends in patients' likelihood of selecting the messages over time. RESULTS: On average, Spanish-speaking patients selected self-care tips during 64% of their ATDM calls compared to 36% for English speakers (p < 0.0001). Spanish speakers also selected dietary education modules more often (52% versus 28%, p < 0.0001). Patients were less likely to select each type of message over the course of their participation in the study. However, after 12 months, most Spanish speakers and roughly one fourth of English speakers continued to select each message type. As a result, participants in both language groups received a substantial amount of patient education. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes are receptive to self-care and dietary education via ATDM. Spanish speakers especially are willing to use ATDM calls to access patient education.
INTRODUCTION: Using diabetes as a prototype, we examined whether automated telephone disease management (ATDM) calls can improve chronically ill patients' access to self-care and dietary information. METHODS: Two-hundred-twenty-six English-speaking patients and 30 Spanish-speaking patients who were recruited from outpatient clinics received bi-weekly ATDM calls for 1 year, in which they were given the opportunity to access patient education messages. We compared the proportion of English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients who selected brief self-care tips and interactive dietary education modules. Within each language group, we examined trends in patients' likelihood of selecting the messages over time. RESULTS: On average, Spanish-speaking patients selected self-care tips during 64% of their ATDM calls compared to 36% for English speakers (p < 0.0001). Spanish speakers also selected dietary education modules more often (52% versus 28%, p < 0.0001). Patients were less likely to select each type of message over the course of their participation in the study. However, after 12 months, most Spanish speakers and roughly one fourth of English speakers continued to select each message type. As a result, participants in both language groups received a substantial amount of patient education. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with diabetes are receptive to self-care and dietary education via ATDM. Spanish speakers especially are willing to use ATDM calls to access patient education.
Authors: Fabio A Almeida; Kimberlee A Pardo; Richard W Seidel; Brenda M Davy; Wen You; Sarah S Wall; Erin Smith; Mark H Greenawald; Paul A Estabrooks Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-06-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: John D Piette; Milton O Mendoza-Avelares; Martha Ganser; Muhima Mohamed; Nicolle Marinec; Sheila Krishnan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: John D Piette; Milton O Mendoza-Avelares; Evan C Milton; Ilta Lange; Roosevelt Fajardo Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Urmimala Sarkar; John D Piette; Ralph Gonzales; Daniel Lessler; Lisa D Chew; Brendan Reilly; Jolene Johnson; Melanie Brunt; Jennifer Huang; Marsha Regenstein; Dean Schillinger Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2007-11-07
Authors: David H Gustafson; Fiona McTavish; David H Gustafson; Jane E Mahoney; Roberta A Johnson; John D Lee; Andrew Quanbeck; Amy K Atwood; Andrew Isham; Raj Veeramani; Lindy Clemson; Dhavan Shah Journal: Trials Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: John D Piette; Jeremy B Sussman; Paul N Pfeiffer; Maria J Silveira; Satinder Singh; Mariel S Lavieri Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Mary L Greaney; Maria De Jesus; Kim M Sprunck-Harrild; Trinidad Tellez; Roshan Bastani; Tracy A Battaglia; James S Michaelson; Karen M Emmons Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 2.830