Literature DB >> 10489898

Adaptive response and its variation in human normal and tumour cells.

G P Raaphorst1, S Boyden.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adaptive responses in mammalian cells appear to be highly variable. Six human cell lines were used to evaluate whether adaptive response could be related to radiation sensitivity or tumour versus normal cell lines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six human cell lines (two fibroblasts, two melanoma, two breast carcinoma) were cultured under identical conditions to plateau phase. The cells were given inducing doses of 0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 Gy followed after incubation at 37 degrees C by challenge doses to assess radiation response.
RESULTS: An adaptive response (AR) was observed in some but not all the cell lines. The AR was observed at 2 h and persisted for up to 24 h. It was observed for doses as low as 0.2 and 0.5 Gy and declined with higher doses. In the resistant melanoma cell line there was no adaptive response; instead it showed sensitization for all inducing doses.
CONCLUSIONS: Human cells can demonstrate an adaptive response. This response is variable among cell lines and appears not to be related to radiosensitivity nor differences between tumour and normal cell lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10489898     DOI: 10.1080/095530099139926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  13 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Transcription profile of DNA damage response genes at G₀ lymphocytes exposed to gamma radiation.

Authors:  Divyalakshmi Saini; Shridevi Shelke; A Mani Vannan; Sneh Toprani; Vinay Jain; Birajalaxmi Das; M Seshadri
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Will radiation-induced bystander effects or adaptive responses impact on the shape of the dose response relationships at low doses of ionizing radiation?

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

5.  Adaptive doses of irradiation-an approach to a new therapy concept for bladder cancer?

Authors:  Moshe Schaffer; Silke B Schwarz; Ulrike Kulka; Martin Busch; Eckhart Dühmke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  An examination of radiation hormesis mechanisms using a multistage carcinogenesis model.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R D Stewart; R E J Mitchel; W Hofmann
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-10

7.  Time- and dose-dependent effects of total-body ionizing radiation on muscle stem cells.

Authors:  Shinya Masuda; Tsubasa Hisamatsu; Daiki Seko; Yoshishige Urata; Shinji Goto; Tao-Sheng Li; Yusuke Ono
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-04

8.  Modeling cell survival and change in amount of DNA during protracted irradiation.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuya; Kaori Tsutsumi; Kohei Sasaki; Yuji Yoshii; Takaaki Kimura; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Low-dose radiation activates Nrf1/2 through reactive species and the Ca(2+)/ERK1/2 signaling pathway in human skin fibroblast cells.

Authors:  Eun Kyeong Lee; Jin-Ah Kim; Seong Joon Park; Jeung Ki Kim; Kyu Heo; Kwang Mo Yang; Tae Gen Son
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.778

10.  Chromosome Damage Caused by Accidental Chronic Whole-Body Gamma Radiation Exposure in Thailand.

Authors:  B A Ulsh; J Dolling; J Lavoie; R E J Mitchel; D R Boreham
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.