Literature DB >> 10489893

Background ionizing radiation plays a minor role in the production of chromosome translocations in a control population.

J N Lucas1, W Deng, D Moore, F Hill, M Wade, A Lewis, F Sailes, C Kramer, A Hsieh, N Galvan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To obtain a relationship between background chromosome translocation frequency and age with translocation frequency measured to a high statistical precision, and to identify the role of background ionizing radiation in the production of chromosome translocations in a control population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lymphocytes from 35 healthy control individuals (15 females and 20 males) were scored, using fluorescence in situ hybridization, for the presence of chromosomal translocations. Translocation frequencies were measured to a high statistical precision (s.d. 25% or less for each individual). These control subjects were of varying ages, ranging from 0 (cord blood) to 98 years.
RESULTS: In a total of 521,492 metaphases (203,754 genome equivalent cells) scored, an average of 5,822 genome equivalent cells per individual, 764 translocations were observed in the 35 individuals. The translocation frequencies ranged from 0 (for cord blood) to 0.0167 (for a 98 year old) translocations per cell. The average age and translocation frequency was 50 years and 0.004 translocations per cell, respectively. The best fit of the relationship between translocations and age was: Y=7x10(-4)+6.9x10(-6)A+1.35x10(-6)A2, which does not obey the linear relationship expected from chronic background radiation alone. The curvilinear relationship observed clearly shows that other endogenous and exogenous clastogens or clastogenic events, in addition to radiation, serve to generate chromosome translocations in control populations.
CONCLUSION: The background translocation frequency in control individuals follows a curvilinear relationship with age. No significant variation was observed between individuals of the same age. Clastogenic processes of normal aging and physiological factors in additional to ionizing radiation play a major role in the production of chromosome translocations in a control population. Background radiation, however, appears to play a minor role in chromosome translocation production in control individuals living near sea level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10489893     DOI: 10.1080/095530099139872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  7 in total

1.  Cytogenetic effect of low dose gamma-radiation in Hordeum vulgare seedlings: non-linear dose-effect relationship.

Authors:  Stanislav A Geras'kin; Alla A Oudalova; Jin Kyu Kim; Vladimir G Dikarev; Nina S Dikareva
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Effects of calorie restriction on chromosomal stability in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Charleen M Moore; Betty G Dunn; C Alex McMahan; Mark A Lane; George S Roth; Donald K Ingram; Julie A Mattison
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2006-11-21

3.  International study of factors affecting human chromosome translocations.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Mina Ha; Michael Hauptmann; Parveen Bhatti; Radim J Sram; Olena Beskid; E Janet Tawn; Caroline A Whitehouse; Carita Lindholm; Mimako Nakano; Yoshiaki Kodama; Nori Nakamura; Irena Vorobtsova; Ursula Oestreicher; Günther Stephan; Lee C Yong; Manfred Bauchinger; Ernst Schmid; Hai Won Chung; Firouz Darroudi; Laurence Roy; Phillipe Voisin; Joan F Barquinero; Gordon Livingston; David Blakey; Isamu Hayata; Wei Zhang; Chunyan Wang; L Michelle Bennett; L Gayle Littlefield; Alan A Edwards; Ruth A Kleinerman; James D Tucker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Comparison of spontaneous background genomic aberration frequencies among cattle, pig and humans using dual-colored FISH.

Authors:  Olga Rezácová; Svatava Kubícková; Halina Cernohorská; Jirí Rubes
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.620

5.  Chromosome Damage Caused by Accidental Chronic Whole-Body Gamma Radiation Exposure in Thailand.

Authors:  B A Ulsh; J Dolling; J Lavoie; R E J Mitchel; D R Boreham
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans.

Authors:  Kara Schnarr; Timothy F Carter; Daniel Gillis; Colin Webber; Jennifer A Lemon; Ian Dayes; Joanna A Dolling; Karen Gulenchyn; Douglas R Boreham
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Persistence of radiation-induced aberrations in patients after radiotherapy with C-ions and IMRT.

Authors:  Carola Hartel; Elena Nasonova; Martina C Fuss; Anna V Nikoghosyan; Juergen Debus; Sylvia Ritter
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.