J C Looi1, P S Sachdev. 1. Neuropsychiatric Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Romwick, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The concept of vascular dementia (VaD) is currently in a state of evolution. Memory impairment is emphasized as a primary criterion, reflecting the influence of AD on the concept of dementia. We have systematically reviewed whether the nature of neuropsychological dysfunction is distinct in AD and VaD, and whether similar defining criteria for the concept of dementia in both disorders can be supported. METHODS: We searched five bibliographic databases (Medline, Biological Abstracts, EMBASE, PsychINFO, PsychLIT) for research articles in which VaD and AD had been compared using neuropsychological tests and that met criteria for scientific merit. RESULTS: Of the 45 studies, 18 were excluded because of inadequacies, and the remaining 27 were analyzed. There were a number of similarities of dysfunction between VaD and AD. However, when matched for age, education, and severity of dementia, VaD patients had relatively superior function in verbal long-term memory and more impairment in frontal executive functioning compared with AD patients. Interpretation of the results is limited by uncertainty in diagnostic criteria for VaD, possible inclusion bias due to use of clinical diagnosis alone, possible overlap of AD and VaD, and the methodologic shortcomings of some studies. CONCLUSIONS: The neuropsychological differentiation of VaD from AD was consistent with the different neuroimaging findings in the two disorders, and argues for differential criteria for the definition of the syndromes. The simple application of Alzheimer's dementia criteria to VaD, with the inclusion of cerebrovascular disease etiology, may not be sufficient to capture the uniqueness of VaD.
BACKGROUND: The concept of vascular dementia (VaD) is currently in a state of evolution. Memory impairment is emphasized as a primary criterion, reflecting the influence of AD on the concept of dementia. We have systematically reviewed whether the nature of neuropsychological dysfunction is distinct in AD and VaD, and whether similar defining criteria for the concept of dementia in both disorders can be supported. METHODS: We searched five bibliographic databases (Medline, Biological Abstracts, EMBASE, PsychINFO, PsychLIT) for research articles in which VaD and AD had been compared using neuropsychological tests and that met criteria for scientific merit. RESULTS: Of the 45 studies, 18 were excluded because of inadequacies, and the remaining 27 were analyzed. There were a number of similarities of dysfunction between VaD and AD. However, when matched for age, education, and severity of dementia, VaD patients had relatively superior function in verbal long-term memory and more impairment in frontal executive functioning compared with ADpatients. Interpretation of the results is limited by uncertainty in diagnostic criteria for VaD, possible inclusion bias due to use of clinical diagnosis alone, possible overlap of AD and VaD, and the methodologic shortcomings of some studies. CONCLUSIONS: The neuropsychological differentiation of VaD from AD was consistent with the different neuroimaging findings in the two disorders, and argues for differential criteria for the definition of the syndromes. The simple application of Alzheimer's dementia criteria to VaD, with the inclusion of cerebrovascular disease etiology, may not be sufficient to capture the uniqueness of VaD.
Authors: Perminder S Sachdev; Deborah Blacker; Dan G Blazer; Mary Ganguli; Dilip V Jeste; Jane S Paulsen; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Liliana Ramirez-Gomez; Ling Zheng; Bruce Reed; Joel Kramer; Dan Mungas; Chris Zarow; Harry Vinters; John M Ringman; Helena Chui Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Mark J Sarnak; Hocine Tighiouart; Tammy M Scott; Kristina V Lou; Eric P Sorensen; Lena M Giang; David A Drew; Kamran Shaffi; James A Strom; Ajay K Singh; Daniel E Weiner Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Gali H Weissberger; Jessica V Strong; Kayla B Stefanidis; Mathew J Summers; Mark W Bondi; Nikki H Stricker Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Michael L Alosco; Mary Beth Spitznagel; Ronald Cohen; Naftali Raz; Lawrence H Sweet; Richard Josephson; Joel Hughes; Jim Rosneck; John Gunstad Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Edward D Huey; Jennifer J Manly; Ming-X Tang; Nicole Schupf; Adam M Brickman; Masood Manoochehri; Jesse Mez; Charles DeCarli; Davangere P Devanand; Richard Mayeux Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Ellen Grober; Charles B Hall; Richard B Lipton; Alan B Zonderman; Susan M Resnick; Claudia Kawas Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.892