Literature DB >> 10488510

Variability of somatosensory-evoked potentials in different stages of scoliosis surgery.

K D Luk1, Y Hu, Y W Wong, J C Leong.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A comparison of the latencies and amplitudes of the somatosensory-evoked potential in different stages of scoliosis surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the normal variability of the somatosensory-evoked potential at different stages of scoliosis surgery and to improve the reliability of spinal cord monitoring. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: False alarms in intra-operative spinal cord monitoring have been reported when the somatosensory-evoked potential measured before skin incision was used as the reference baseline value. However, the normal variability during different stages of surgery and the specificity of somatosensory-evoked potential is not well documented.
METHODS: The somatosensory-evoked potential of 90 patients who underwent surgical correction for idiopathic scoliosis was monitored intraoperatively, with stimuli applied to the posterior tibial nerve. The amplitudes and latencies of the somatosensory-evoked potential were recorded over Cz'-Fz and Cv-Fz. The values of latencies and amplitudes and their percentage variabilities were analyzed.
RESULTS: The values of latencies and their percentage variabilities did not differ significantly from each other in different stages of surgery. The values of amplitudes between different stages showed statistically significant differences. In particular, the amplitude of the somatosensory-evoked potential was found to be significantly decreased after exposure of the spine when compared with the amplitude before skin incision.
CONCLUSION: Some variability in latencies and amplitudes between different stages of scoliosis surgery is normal. These results suggest that the somatosensory-evoked potential when the spine is exposed may be used as the reference baseline to determine whether somatosensory-evoked potentials are subnormal at the subsequent stages of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10488510     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Application of time-frequency analysis to somatosensory evoked potential for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Y Hu; K D K Luk; W W Lu; J C Y Leong
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Multimodal Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring during Spinal Deformity Surgery: Efficacy, Diagnostic Characteristics, and Algorithm Development.

Authors:  Athanasios I Tsirikos; Andrew D Duckworth; Lindsay E Henderson; Ciara Michaelson
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Single-trial detection for intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials monitoring.

Authors:  L Hu; Z G Zhang; H T Liu; K D K Luk; Y Hu
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring.

Authors:  F Pastorelli; M Di Silvestre; R Plasmati; R Michelucci; T Greggi; A Morigi; M R Bacchin; S Bonarelli; A Cioni; F Vommaro; N Fini; F Lolli; P Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: surgical strategy and management outcomes.

Authors:  Tarek Anwar Elfiky; Dino Samartzis; Wai-Yuen Cheung; Yat-Wa Wong; Keith D K Luk; Kenneth M C Cheung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2011-12

6.  Comparison of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring efficacy in early childhood and school aged children undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Alpaslan Şenköylü; Murat Zinnuroğlu; Alp Börçek; Erdem Aktaş; İrfan Güngör; Mehmet Beyazova
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 1.511

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.