Literature DB >> 10487588

Endovascular vs open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a comparison of cardiac morbidity and mortality.

C de Virgilio1, H Bui, C Donayre, L Ephraim, R J Lewis, M Elbassir, B E Stabile, R White.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Adverse cardiac event rates following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EAAA) and open abdominal aortic aneurysm (OAAA) repair are similar. We also hypothesized that the Eagle criteria (Q wave on electrocardiogram, diabetes, angina, congestive heart failure, age >70 years, and ventricular ectopy) are useful predictors of cardiac events in patients undergoing EAAA repair.
DESIGN: Prospective (patients undergoing EAAA repair) and retrospective (patients undergoing OAAA repair).
SETTING: Public teaching and Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS: Eighty-three EAAA and 63 OAAA repairs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and cardiac death.
RESULTS: Patients with EAAA were older (73 vs 68 years, P=.003). There were no differences in the mean number of Eagle criteria (1.2 vs 1.3), cardiac event rates (6% vs 4.8%), or mortalities (3.6% vs 4.8%). Within the EAAA group, congestive heart failure (P=.005) and Q wave on electrocardiogram (P=.006) were the only predictors of cardiac events.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing OAAA and EAAA repair had similar cardiac event rates and mortality. In patients undergoing EAAA repair, history of congestive heart failure and Q wave on electrocardiogram were predictors of cardiac events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10487588     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.134.9.947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  4 in total

1.  Results of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with general, regional, and local/monitored anesthesia care in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Matthew S Edwards; Jeanette S Andrews; Angela F Edwards; Racheed J Ghanami; Matthew A Corriere; Philip P Goodney; Christopher J Godshall; Kimberley J Hansen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR.

Authors:  Robert Hopkins; James Bowen; Kaitryn Campbell; Gord Blackhouse; Guy De Rose; Teresa Novick; Daria O'Reilly; Ron Goeree; Jean-Eric Tarride
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008

3.  Clinical Utility of Coronary CT Angiography with Stress Perfusion CT in Preoperative Cardiac Risk Evaluation.

Authors:  Sung-A Chang; Sung Mok Kim; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Young-Wook Kim; Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 4.  Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Elective and Emergent Setting in a Pooled Population of 37,781 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dustin M Thomas; Edward A Hulten; Shane T Ellis; David M F Anderson; Nathan Anderson; Fiora McRae; Jamil A Malik; Todd C Villines; Ahmad M Slim
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.