PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal eating behaviors in women on active duty in the Army. METHODS: A total of 423 female soldiers from the general population on active duty volunteered to participate in this study. They completed the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) questionnaire. Each questionnaire was screened and any woman on active duty practicing abnormal eating behaviors (criteria set up by the authors) underwent an interview. A diagnosis, using DSM IV criteria, of one of the following was determined from the interview: 1) No eating disorder, (2) Anorexia nervosa, 3) Bulimia nervosa, 4) binge eating disorder, 5a) Eating disorder NOS, and 5b) Situational eating disorder. A situational eating disorder was defined as any abnormal eating behaviors consistent with an eating disorder NOS that was practiced intermittently and in response to external pressures associated with significant distress, such as military weigh-ins or army physical fitness testing (APFT). RESULTS: Of the 423 women on active duty who participated, 33.6% (N = 142) met the questionnaire screening criteria for being "at risk" for abnormal eating behaviors and underwent an interview. Of the 142 women interviewed, 33 (8%) women were diagnosed with an eating disorder. The women with eating disorders exercised, felt dissatisfied with their weight, and felt significantly more pressure about their weight than the women without eating disorders. In addition, they also had significantly greater scores on the Drive for Thinness (DT), Bulemia (B), and Body Dissatisfaction (BD) subscales, and the total EDI scores for both the 8 and 11 subscales. CONCLUSION: In the women on active duty in the Army studied, there was an 8% prevalence of eating disorders.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal eating behaviors in women on active duty in the Army. METHODS: A total of 423 female soldiers from the general population on active duty volunteered to participate in this study. They completed the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) questionnaire. Each questionnaire was screened and any woman on active duty practicing abnormal eating behaviors (criteria set up by the authors) underwent an interview. A diagnosis, using DSM IV criteria, of one of the following was determined from the interview: 1) No eating disorder, (2) Anorexia nervosa, 3) Bulimia nervosa, 4) binge eating disorder, 5a) Eating disorder NOS, and 5b) Situational eating disorder. A situational eating disorder was defined as any abnormal eating behaviors consistent with an eating disorder NOS that was practiced intermittently and in response to external pressures associated with significant distress, such as military weigh-ins or army physical fitness testing (APFT). RESULTS: Of the 423 women on active duty who participated, 33.6% (N = 142) met the questionnaire screening criteria for being "at risk" for abnormal eating behaviors and underwent an interview. Of the 142 women interviewed, 33 (8%) women were diagnosed with an eating disorder. The women with eating disorders exercised, felt dissatisfied with their weight, and felt significantly more pressure about their weight than the women without eating disorders. In addition, they also had significantly greater scores on the Drive for Thinness (DT), Bulemia (B), and Body Dissatisfaction (BD) subscales, and the total EDI scores for both the 8 and 11 subscales. CONCLUSION: In the women on active duty in the Army studied, there was an 8% prevalence of eating disorders.
Authors: Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Tracy Sbrocco; Kelly R Theim; L Adelyn Cohen; Eleanor R Mackey; Eric Stice; Jennifer L Henderson; Sarah J McCreight; Edny J Bryant; Mark B Stephens Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Natasha A Schvey; Tracy Sbrocco; Mark Stephens; Edny J Bryant; Rachel Ress; Elena A Spieker; Allison Conforte; Jennifer L Bakalar; Courtney K Pickworth; Marissa Barmine; David Klein; Sheila M Brady; Jack A Yanovski; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 4.861