OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to survey providers within a large health maintenance organization regarding their attitudes and practice patterns related to counseling women about hormone replacement therapy (HRT). DESIGN: A total of 260 providers from gynecology (n = 81), family practice (n = 96), and internal medicine (n = 83) from owned and contracted clinics were surveyed. Each was asked about prescribing philosophies, behaviors, and barriers to providing counseling regarding HRT. RESULTS: Respondents reported HRT's greatest benefit to be in the prevention of osteoporosis (99%) and cardiovascular conditions (96%). Gynecologists were more likely to report the benefits of HRT for Alzheimer's than were clinicians in internal medicine or family practice (p < 0.05), and women providers were more likely than men to report this (p < 0.01). There was no statistical difference based on years in practice. Providers did not vary significantly by specialty or sex in their concerns of risk for breast cancer of endometrial cancer. However, those in family practice and internal medicine were significantly more likely to report concern about thromboembolism (p < 0.01). Only 42% of physicians claimed to initiate discussion with their patients more than 75% of the time. The two factors most often mentioned as barriers to counseling were time and lack of adequate knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Providers want to be an integral part of their patient's education regarding HRT; however, time constrains and a need for adequate information make this difficult. Now health systems must examine models of education for both providers and patients to ensure that women have access to current information with which to make informed decisions.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to survey providers within a large health maintenance organization regarding their attitudes and practice patterns related to counseling women about hormone replacement therapy (HRT). DESIGN: A total of 260 providers from gynecology (n = 81), family practice (n = 96), and internal medicine (n = 83) from owned and contracted clinics were surveyed. Each was asked about prescribing philosophies, behaviors, and barriers to providing counseling regarding HRT. RESULTS: Respondents reported HRT's greatest benefit to be in the prevention of osteoporosis (99%) and cardiovascular conditions (96%). Gynecologists were more likely to report the benefits of HRT for Alzheimer's than were clinicians in internal medicine or family practice (p < 0.05), and women providers were more likely than men to report this (p < 0.01). There was no statistical difference based on years in practice. Providers did not vary significantly by specialty or sex in their concerns of risk for breast cancer of endometrial cancer. However, those in family practice and internal medicine were significantly more likely to report concern about thromboembolism (p < 0.01). Only 42% of physicians claimed to initiate discussion with their patients more than 75% of the time. The two factors most often mentioned as barriers to counseling were time and lack of adequate knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Providers want to be an integral part of their patient's education regarding HRT; however, time constrains and a need for adequate information make this difficult. Now health systems must examine models of education for both providers and patients to ensure that women have access to current information with which to make informed decisions.