Literature DB >> 10486465

Risk adjustment for complications of hysterectomy: limitations of routinely collected administrative data.

E R Myers1, J F Steege.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the utility of routinely collected administrative data for risk adjustment for complications of hysterectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Using abstracted discharge data on 107, 648 women undergoing hysterectomy in North Carolina from 1988 through 1994, we constructed logistic regression models for the prediction of medical and surgical complications incorporating coded demographic, diagnostic, and procedural data.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 16%, with surgical complications (11.8%) more common than medical complications (6.7%). Hysterectomy type, teaching hospital status, patient age >/=65 years, and insurance status of Medicaid or no insurance were significantly associated with both medical and surgical complication risk, as were procedures performed for cancer or pregnancy complications. Models that incorporated coded comorbidity were better predictors of medical complications (C = 0.714) than surgical complications (C = 0.630).
CONCLUSION: Although surgical complications of hysterectomy are more common than medical complications, risk adjustment methods that use routinely collected administrative data are better at predicting medical complications. Ambiguities in coding, misclassification, and uncoded factors such as disease severity limit the utility of administrative data for risk adjustment for hysterectomy complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10486465     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70494-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Decreasing utilization of hysterectomy: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1965-2002.

Authors:  Ebenezer O Babalola; Adil E Bharucha; Cathy D Schleck; John B Gebhart; Alan R Zinsmeister; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Reported symptoms before and one year after hysterectomy in African American and white women.

Authors:  Patricia G Moorman; Joellen M Schildkraut; Evan R Myers; Frances Wang
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States.

Authors:  Eden R Cardozo; Andrew D Clark; Nicole K Banks; Melinda B Henne; Barbara J Stegmann; James H Segars
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Determining perioperative complications associated with vaginal hysterectomy: code classification versus chart review.

Authors:  Christine A Heisler; L Joseph Melton; Amy L Weaver; John B Gebhart
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Insurance Type and Major Complications After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Carolyn Weaver Swenson; Neil S Kamdar; Helen Levy; Darrell A Campbell; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Outcomes of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Conditions: Influence of Patient Complexity.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Tina Raine-Bennett; Liyan Liu; Stacey E Alexeeff; Wilfredo Ramos; Betty Suh-Burgmann
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-12-18

7.  Gynaecologists estimate and experience laparoscopic hysterectomy as more difficult compared with abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Theodoor E Nieboer; Marc E A Spaanderman; Marlies Y Bongers; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-05-28

8.  Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study.

Authors:  Linda C Cummings; Conor P Delaney; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.253

9.  The Comparing Options for Management: PAtient-centered REsults for Uterine Fibroids (COMPARE-UF) registry: rationale and design.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Barbara L Lytle; Laine Thomas; Ganesa R Wegienka; Vanessa Jacoby; Michael P Diamond; Wanda K Nicholson; Raymond M Anchan; Sateria Venable; Kedra Wallace; Erica E Marsh; George L Maxwell; Bijan J Borah; William H Catherino; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 8.661

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.