Literature DB >> 10486332

An empirical exploration of the (delta mu)2 genetic distance for 213 human microsatellite markers.

G Cooper1, W Amos, R Bellamy, M R Siddiqui, A Frodsham, A V Hill, D C Rubinsztein.   

Abstract

Microsatellites are now used ubiquitously as genetic markers. One important application is to the assessment of population subdivision and phylogenetic relatedness. Such applications require a method of estimation of genetic distance. Here we examine the most widely used measure of microsatellite genetic distance, Goldstein et al.'s delta-mu squared ([delta mu]2), with respect to a large data set of 213 markers typed across samples from four diverse human populations. We find that (delta mu)2 yields plausible interpopulation distances. For the first time, we report significant interpopulation differences in mean microsatellite length, although the effect of these differences on (delta mu)2 is negligible. However, we also show that the method is extremely sensitive to one or two loci that contribute extreme values, even when a sample size of >200 loci is used. Some of these extreme loci can be removed on the grounds that some alleles carry large indels, but for others there is no clear justification for exclusion a priori. Our data suggest a rather recent African/non-African split, with an upper limit of some 70,000-80,000 years ago.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10486332      PMCID: PMC1288246          DOI: 10.1086/302574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  24 in total

1.  Interethnic genetic differentiation in Africa: HLA class I antigens in The Gambia.

Authors:  C E Allsopp; R M Harding; C Taylor; M Bunce; D Kwiatkowski; N Anstey; D Brewster; A J McMichael; B M Greenwood; A V Hill
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Microsatellite behavior with range constraints: parameter estimation and improved distances for use in phylogenetic reconstruction.

Authors:  D D Pollock; A Bergman; M W Feldman; D B Goldstein
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Microsatellites and kinship.

Authors:  D C Queller; J E Strassmann; C R Hughes
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Microsatellite evolution: testing the ascertainment bias hypothesis.

Authors:  A M Crawford; S M Kappes; K A Paterson; M J deGotari; K G Dodds; B A Freking; R T Stone; C W Beattie
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Microsatellite genetic distances with range constraints: analytic description and problems of estimation.

Authors:  M W Feldman; A Bergman; D D Pollock; D B Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mutation of human short tandem repeats.

Authors:  J L Weber; C Wong
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci.

Authors:  D B Goldstein; A Ruiz Linares; L L Cavalli-Sforza; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The root of the phylogenetic tree of human populations.

Authors:  M Nei; N Takezaki
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites.

Authors:  A M Bowcock; A Ruiz-Linares; J Tomfohrde; E Minch; J R Kidd; L L Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association mapping in structured populations.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; N A Rosenberg; P Donnelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-26       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Independent methods for evolutionary genetic dating provide insights into Y-chromosomal STR mutation rates confirming data from direct father-son transmissions.

Authors:  Francesca Luca; M Basile; F Di Giacomo; A Novelletto
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Empirical tests of the reliability of phylogenetic trees constructed with microsatellite DNA.

Authors:  Naoko Takezaki; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  HighSSR: high-throughput SSR characterization and locus development from next-gen sequencing data.

Authors:  Alexander Churbanov; Rachael Ryan; Nabeeh Hasan; Donovan Bailey; Haofeng Chen; Brook Milligan; Peter Houde
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Evidence that pairing with genetically similar mates is maladaptive in a monogamous bird.

Authors:  Hervé Mulard; Etienne Danchin; Sandra L Talbot; Andrew M Ramey; Scott A Hatch; Joël F White; Fabrice Helfenstein; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Deriving evolutionary relationships among populations using microsatellites and (deltamu)(2): all loci are equal, but some are more equal than others...

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Landry; Mikko T Koskinen; Craig R Primmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Influence of language and ancestry on genetic structure of contiguous populations: a microsatellite based study on populations of Orissa.

Authors:  Sanghamitra Sahoo; V K Kashyap
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-02-05       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 8.  Microsatellites in Pursuit of Microbial Genome Evolution.

Authors:  Abdullah F Saeed; Rongzhi Wang; Shihua Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.