Literature DB >> 10485967

Genetic differences in cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in mice depend on conditioning trial duration.

C L Cunningham1, S D Dickinson, N J Grahame, D M Okorn, C S McMullin.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: In previous comparisons with C57BL/6J mice, DBA/2J mice have been characterized as "hyporesponsive" to cocaine's rewarding effect in the conditioned place-preference paradigm. This finding contrasts with other studies showing greater sensitivity of DBA/2J mice to the rewarding effects of ethanol and morphine in the place conditioning task.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to examine cocaine- induced place conditioning in both strains using apparatus and procedures similar to those used previously to assess ethanol and morphine preference conditioning.
METHODS: Mice from both strains were exposed to an unbiased place-conditioning procedure using 1, 10, or 30 mg/kg cocaine. Conditioning trial duration was 15, 30, or 60 min.
RESULTS: In general, C57BL/6J mice displayed a significant conditioned place preference that was relatively unaffected by cocaine dose or trial duration. In contrast, DBA/2J mice showed no place conditioning at the shortest trial duration, but an increasing level of preference as trial duration increased. At the longest trial duration, both strains showed similar levels of place preference.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic differences in sensitivity to cocaine's rewarding effect depend critically on temporal parameters of the place-conditioning procedure. One possible interpretation of these findings is that short trial durations produce conditioned activity responses that interfere more with expression of conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice than in C57BL/6J mice. More generally, these findings underscore the need for caution when drawing conclusions about genetic differences in place conditioning, especially when using this paradigm to evaluate the effects of gene knockouts or insertions on drug reward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10485967     DOI: 10.1007/s002130051090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  23 in total

1.  Unique genetic factors influence sensitivity to the rewarding and aversive effects of methamphetamine versus cocaine.

Authors:  Noah R Gubner; Cheryl Reed; Carrie S McKinnon; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Influence of the dose and the number of drug-context pairings on the magnitude and the long-lasting retention of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Christian Brabant; Etienne Quertemont; Ezio Tirelli
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Susceptibility to conditioned place preference induced by addictive drugs in mice of the C57BL/6 and DBA/2 inbred strains.

Authors:  C Orsini; A Bonito-Oliva; D Conversi; S Cabib
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Characterization of conditioned place preference to cocaine in congenic dopamine transporter knockout female mice.

Authors:  Ivan O Medvedev; Raul R Gainetdinov; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Laura M Bohn; Marc G Caron; Linda A Dykstra
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Morphine-induced conditioned place preference and effects of morphine pre-exposure in adolescent and adult male C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Wouter Koek
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Role of test activity in ethanol-induced disruption of place preference expression in mice.

Authors:  Christina M Gremel; Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Availability of N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Coagonists Affects Cocaine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Sensitization: Implications for Comorbid Schizophrenia and Substance Abuse.

Authors:  Matthew D Puhl; Alexandra R Berg; Anita J Bechtholt; Joseph T Coyle
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Nicotine enhances the locomotor stimulating but not the conditioned rewarding effect of ethanol in DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Noah R Gubner; Christopher L Cunningham; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Mouse strain differences in opiate reward learning are explained by differences in anxiety, not reward or learning.

Authors:  C L Dockstader; D van der Kooy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Genetic variation in the psychomotor stimulant properties of cocaine in Mus musculus.

Authors:  Chris Downing; Kristina Rodd-Henricks; Rodney J Marley; Bruce C Dudek
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.