Literature DB >> 10485473

Patterns of DNA adduct formation in liver and mammary epithelial cells of rats treated with 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, and selective effects of chemopreventive agents.

A Izzotti1, A Camoirano, C Cartiglia, C J Grubbs, R A Lubet, G J Kelloff, S De Flora.   

Abstract

7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) is a prototype carcinogen that induces a high yield of mammary tumors in rats after a single feeding. We investigated the induction and chemoprevention of DNA adducts in female Sprague Dawley rats receiving DMBA by gavage according to a variety of treatment schedules. The patterns of 32P-postlabeled DNA adducts in liver and mammary epithelial cells were similar to those produced by the in vitro reaction of metabolically activated DMBA with calf thymus DNA. There was a high and statistically significant correlation between dose of DMBA administered to rats (0, 0.6, 2.4, and 12 mg/kg body weight) and levels of DNA adducts in both types of cells. The regression lines relating DMBA doses to total DNA adduct levels were significantly divergent and crossed at 1.5 mg/kg body weight, indicating that, at lower doses, the formation of DNA adducts is more intense in target mammary cells, whereas at higher doses, DNA adduct levels are more elevated in liver cells, presumably due to the greater metabolic capacity of this organ. When the rats were sacrificed 7 days rather than 2 days after DMBA administration, DNA adduct levels were approximately halved in both liver and mammary cells. The observed patterns can be interpreted based on toxicokinetic factors, local and distant metabolism, removal of DNA adducts by excision repair, and cell proliferation rate. Of three chemopreventive agents given with the diet to rats treated with 12 mg of DMBA, 5,6-benzoflavone (1650 ppm) was the most effective, inhibiting DNA adduct formation in liver and mammary cells by 96.5 and 83.5%, respectively. Feeding of 1,2-dithiole-3-thione (600 ppm) inhibited this biomarker by 68.5 and 50.2%, whereas butyl hydroxyanisole (BHA; 5000 ppm) showed a significant inhibition in the liver (46.5%) but was ineffective in mammary cells (29.0%, not significant). These data correlate nicely with the results of a parallel study in which 5,6-benzoflavone, 1,2-dithiole-3-thione, and BHA inhibited formation of hemoglobin adducts by 80.0, 44.0, and 0%, respectively; the incidence of mammary tumors by 82.4, 47.1, and 5.9%, respectively; and their multiplicity by 92.6, 80.0, and 7.4%, respectively. Therefore, biomarkers of biologically effective dose are highly predictive of the efficacy of chemopreventive agents in the DMBA rat mammary model. The selective inhibition by BHA of DNA adducts in the liver but not in mammary cells is consistent with the finding that this phenolic antioxidant stimulated phase II activities in the liver but not in the mammary gland (L. L. Song et al., manuscript in preparation). In any case, the broad-spectrum inducer 5,6-BF appears to be more effective than the two monofunctional phase II inducers, presumably because an enhanced activation of DMBA to reactive metabolites is coordinated with their blocking, detoxification, and excretion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10485473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  13 in total

1.  Role of mammary epithelial and stromal P450 enzymes in the clearance and metabolic activation of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene in mice.

Authors:  Yang Lin; Yunyi Yao; Senyan Liu; Lihua Wang; Bhagavatula Moorthy; Dongsheng Xiong; Tao Cheng; Xinxin Ding; Jun Gu
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Promoting effect of a high-fat/high-protein diet in DMBA-induced ductal pancreatic cancer in rats.

Authors:  K Z'graggen; A L Warshaw; J Werner; F Graeme-Cook; R E Jimenez; C Fernández-Del Castillo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  5MeCDDO Blocks Metabolic Activation but not Progression of Breast, Intestine, and Tongue Cancers. Is Antioxidant Response Element a Prevention Target?

Authors:  Ronald A Lubet; Reid Townsend; Margie L Clapper; M Margaret Juliana; Vernon E Steele; David L McCormick; Clinton J Grubbs
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-05-05

4.  Aspirin abrogates impairment of mammary gland differentiation induced by early in life second-hand smoke in mice.

Authors:  Julia Santucci-Pereira; Thomas J Pogash; Aman Patel; Navroop Hundal; Maria Barton; Anna Camoirano; Rosanna T Micale; Sebastiano La Maestra; Roumen Balansky; Silvio De Flora; Jose Russo
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Regio- and stereoselective metabolism of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene by Mycobacterium vanbaalenii PYR-1.

Authors:  Joanna D Moody; Peter P Fu; James P Freeman; Carl E Cerniglia
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Beta-naphthoflavone (DB06732) mediates estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell cycle arrest through AhR-dependent regulation of PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signaling.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Can-Xin Xu; Yiwen Bu; Kathleen M Bottum; Shelley A Tischkau
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Chemopreventive and anti-breast cancer activity of compounds isolated from leaves of Abrus precatorius L.

Authors:  Mohammed Shafi Sofi; M K Sateesh; Mohsin Bashir; Mohd Ashraf Ganie; Shabnum Nabi
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Hypothesis: Targeted Ikkβ deletion upregulates MIF signaling responsiveness and MHC class II expression in mouse hepatocytes.

Authors:  Katherine S Koch; Hyam L Leffert
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2010-03

9.  Pronounced cancer resistance in a subterranean rodent, the blind mole-rat, Spalax: in vivo and in vitro evidence.

Authors:  Irena Manov; Mark Hirsh; Theodore C Iancu; Assaf Malik; Nick Sotnichenko; Mark Band; Aaron Avivi; Imad Shams
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 10.  New exposure biomarkers as tools for breast cancer epidemiology, biomonitoring, and prevention: a systematic approach based on animal evidence.

Authors:  Ruthann A Rudel; Janet M Ackerman; Kathleen R Attfield; Julia Green Brody
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.