Literature DB >> 10485082

Implications for clinical pharmacodynamic studies of the statistical characterization of an in vitro antiproliferation assay.

L M Levasseur1, H Faessel, H K Slocum, W R Greco.   

Abstract

Modeling of nonlinear pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships necessitates the utilization of a weighting function in order to compensate for the heteroscedasticity. The structure of the variance was studied for concentration-effect data generated in an in vitro 96-well plate cell growth inhibition assay, where data are numerous (480 data points per experiment) and replication is easy. From the five candidate models that were considered, the power function S2Y = phi 2Y phi 3, where Y is the sample mean and S2Y is the sample variance, was shown to be the most appropriate to describe the nonuniformity of the variance along the range of measured effect for 253 sets of (Y; S2Y) data. The Hill model was fit to the concentration-effect data with weighted nonlinear regression, where the weights were equal to the reciprocal of the predicted variance. The examination of the distribution of the 253 sets of parameters of the PD model showed that IC50 was lognormally distributed whereas the distribution of gamma was normal. The characterization of the appropriate variance function and concentration-effect function in a simple in vitro experimental setting with a large number of experiments, with each experiment including a large number of data points, will be useful for guiding similar in vitro concentration-effect studies where data are plentiful and for guiding PD modeling in complex clinical settings in which extensive data for model characterization is impossible to obtain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10485082     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020755124451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  15 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of radioligand assay data.

Authors:  D Rodbard; G R Frazier
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Statistical characterization of the random errors in the radioimmunoassay dose--response variable.

Authors:  D Rodbard; R H Lenox; H L Wray; D Ramseth
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Modeling of the time-dependency of in vitro drug cytotoxicity and resistance.

Authors:  L M Levasseur; H K Slocum; Y M Rustum; W R Greco
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Characterization of human ovarian and endometrial carcinoma cell lines established on extracellular matrix.

Authors:  K Crickard; M J Niedbala; U Crickard; M Yoonessi; A A Sandberg; K Okuyama; R J Bernacki; S K Satchidanand
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Error structure as a function of substrate and inhibitor concentration in enzyme kinetic experiments.

Authors:  B Mannervik; I Jakobson; M Warholm
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1986-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 6.  Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling in vivo.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Crit Rev Bioeng       Date:  1981

8.  Assessments of the sensitivities of cultured human neuroblastoma cells to anti-tumour drugs.

Authors:  B T Hill; R D Whelan
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.756

9.  Combined action of paclitaxel and cisplatin against wildtype and resistant human ovarian carcinoma cells.

Authors:  L M Levasseur; W R Greco; Y M Rustum; H K Slocum
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Reversal of adriamycin resistance by verapamil in human ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A M Rogan; T C Hamilton; R C Young; R W Klecker; R F Ozols
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optimal design for estimating parameters of the 4-parameter hill model.

Authors:  Leonid A Khinkis; Laurence Levasseur; Hélène Faessel; William R Greco
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-07

2.  A Simple Approach to Determine a Curve Fitting Model with a Correct Weighting Function for Calibration Curves in Quantitative Ligand Binding Assays.

Authors:  Yuhong Xiang; Jean Donley; Elena Seletskaia; Sonal Shingare; John Kamerud; Boris Gorovits
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Arsenic trioxide affects signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins through alteration of protein tyrosine kinase phosphorylation.

Authors:  Meir Wetzler; Michael T Brady; Erin Tracy; Zhang-Rong Li; Kathleen A Donohue; Kieran L O'Loughlin; Yijun Cheng; Amir Mortazavi; Amy A McDonald; Padmaja Kunapuli; Paul K Wallace; Maria R Baer; John K Cowell; Heinz Baumann
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Targeting 11q23 positive acute leukemia cells with high molecular weight-melanoma associated antigen-specific monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Allison S Drake; Michael T Brady; Xin Hui Wang; Sheila J N Sait; Justin C Earp; Sampa Ghoshal Gupta; Soldano Ferrone; Eunice S Wang; Meir Wetzler
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 6.968

5.  Predicting drug pharmacokinetics and effect in vascularized tumors using computer simulation.

Authors:  John P Sinek; Sandeep Sanga; Xiaoming Zheng; Hermann B Frieboes; Mauro Ferrari; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.259

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.