Literature DB >> 10484575

Comparison of the response to histamine challenge of the nose and the maxillary sinus: effect of loratadine.

F M Baroody1, A Gungor, M deTineo, L Haney, C Blair, R M Naclerio.   

Abstract

To study the response of the maxillary sinus to histamine provocation, we performed a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial during which nonallergic subjects without symptoms of rhinitis (n = 25) received either 10 mg loratadine or placebo once daily for a week and then underwent nasal challenge with histamine (3, 10, and 30 mg/ml) followed, 24 h later, by a maxillary sinus challenge while still receiving the medication. Nasal challenge with histamine led to significant increases in vascular permeability, reflex nasal secretions, sneezing, and other nasal symptoms. Sinus challenge resulted in significant increases in vascular permeability within the sinus cavity (P < 0.01) and some nasal symptoms but no significant change in reflex nasal secretions. The response of the sinus mucosa to histamine was lower in magnitude than that of the nose. Treatment with loratadine resulted in a significant inhibition of the histamine-induced changes in both nasal and sinus cavities. Our data suggest the lack of a sinonasal reflex response to histamine provocation of the maxillary sinus of nonallergic individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10484575     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.3.1038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  8 in total

Review 1.  Nasonasal reflexes, the nasal cycle, and sneeze.

Authors:  James N Baraniuk; Dennis Kim
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  An evaluation of short-term corticosteroid response in perennial allergic rhinitis using histamine and adenosine monophosphate nasal challenge.

Authors:  Andrew M Wilson; Erika J Sims; Linda C Orr; Fiona Robb; Brian J Lipworth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Olfaction.

Authors:  Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2011-03

Review 5.  Rhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Daniel L Hamilos; James A Hadley; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; Richard A Nicklas; Claus Bachert; James Baraniuk; Fuad M Baroody; Michael S Benninger; Itzhak Brook; Badrul A Chowdhury; Howard M Druce; Stephen Durham; Berrylin Ferguson; Jack M Gwaltney; Michael Kaliner; David W Kennedy; Valerie Lund; Robert Naclerio; Ruby Pawankar; Jay F Piccirillo; Patricia Rohane; Ronald Simon; Raymond G Slavin; Alkis Togias; Ellen R Wald; S James Zinreich
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  Rhinosinusitis: establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Daniel L Hamilos; James A Hadley; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; Richard A Nicklas; Claus Bachert; James Baraniuk; Fuad M Baroody; Michael S Benninger; Itzhak Brook; Badrul A Chowdhury; Howard M Druce; Stephen Durham; Berrylin Ferguson; Jack M Gwaltney; Michael Kaliner; David W Kennedy; Valerie Lund; Robert Naclerio; Ruby Pawankar; Jay F Piccirillo; Patricia Rohane; Ronald Simon; Raymond G Slavin; Alkis Togias; Ellen R Wald; S James Zinreich
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Unilateral nasal allergic reactions increase bilateral sinus eosinophil infiltration.

Authors:  Fuad M Baroody; Marcella Detineo; Robert M Naclerio
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-08-22

Review 8.  Neurogenic mechanisms in rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  J N Baraniuk
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.