Literature DB >> 10483954

Prognostic implications of myocardial contractile reserve in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

F A Chaudhry1, J T Tauke, R S Alessandrini, G Vardi, M A Parker, R O Bonow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to assess the prognostic implications of myocardial contractile reserve (MCR) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.
BACKGROUND: MCR during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) identifies viable myocardium that may improve in function after revascularization. Whether revascularization influences prognosis of patients with MCR has not been determined.
METHODS: We performed DSE in 80 patients with CAD and LV dysfunction (ejection fraction < or =40%). Viable myocardium was defined in dysfunctional myocardial segments as enhanced thickening and contraction during low-dose dobutamine (5 to 10 mcg/kg/min). Serial prospective follow-up was obtained in all patients (mean follow-up 2.2 +/- 1.1 years).
RESULTS: Among 52 patients treated medically, there were 20 cardiac deaths. By multivariate analysis, the number of dysfunctional segments demonstrating MCR was the strongest predictor of survival (p < 0.03). Patients with MCR had better initial survival during medical therapy than did those without MCR, but this survival advantage was not maintained beyond three years. In contrast, survival was excellent in patients with MCR who underwent myocardial revascularization. Among 58 patients with MCR in > or =5 myocardial segments, survival at three years was 93 +/- 6% in the 24 patients who were revascularized but only 49 +/- 15% in the 34 treated medically (p < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial contractile reserve is a significant predictor of survival in patients with CAD and LV dysfunction undergoing medical therapy. Although patients with MCR have an initial survival advantage, this advantage is lost over the course of three years. In contrast, survival in patients with significant MCR is enhanced by revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10483954     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00252-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  27 in total

Review 1.  Hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  R Schulz; G Heusch
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Assessment of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  The historical and conceptual evolution of radionuclide assessment of myocardial viability.

Authors:  James E Udelson; Robert O Bonow; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Radionuclide techniques for the assessment of myocardial viability and hibernation.

Authors:  J J Bax; E E van der Wall; M Harbinson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Multimodality imaging for assessment of myocardial viability: nuclear, echocardiography, MR, and CT.

Authors:  James A Arrighi; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Quantity of viable myocardium required to improve survival with revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoichi Inaba; Jennifer A Chen; Steven R Bergmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  John M Canty; James A Fallavollita
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography: does it predict response to beta-blockers in patients with heart failure?

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Khashayar Hematpour; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2006-06

9.  Low dose wall motion score predicts the short and long-term benefit of surgical revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasir Abdul Ghaffar; Waddah Maskoun; Nowwar G Mustafa; Harvey Feigenbaum; Stephen G Sawada
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Prognostic and therapeutic implications of myocardial viability in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Prem Soman; James E Udelson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.