Literature DB >> 10483835

Predictors of outcome in cauda equina syndrome.

J G Kennedy1, K E Soffe, A McGrath, M M Stephens, M G Walsh, F McManus.   

Abstract

This retrospective review examined the cause, level of pathology, onset of symptoms, time taken to treatment, and outcome of 19 patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES). The minimum time to follow up was 22 months. Logistical regression analysis was used to determine how these factors influenced the eventual outcome. Out of 19 patients, 14 had satisfactory recovery at 2 years post-decompression; 5 patients were left with some residual dysfunction. The mean time to decompression in the group with a satisfactory outcome was 14 h (range 6-24 h) whilst that of the group with the poor outcome was 30 h (range 20-72 h). There was a clear correlation between delayed decompression and a poor outcome (P = 0.023). Saddle hypoaesthesia was evident in all patients. In addition complete perineal anaesthesia was evident in 7/19 patients, 5 of whom developed a poor outcome. Bladder dysfunction was observed in 19/19 patients, with 12/19 regarded as having significant impairment. Of the five patients identified as having a poor overall outcome, all five presented with a significant sphincter disturbance and 4/5 were left with residual sphincter dysfunction. There was a clear correlation between the presence of complete perineal anaesthesia and significant sphincter dysfunction as both univariate and multivariate predictors of a poor overall outcome. The association between a slower onset of CES and a more favourable outcome did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.052). No correlation could be found between initial motor function loss, bilateral sciatica, level or cause of injury as predictors of a poor outcome (P>0.05). CES can be diagnosed early by judicious physical examination, with particular attention to perineal sensation and a history of urinary dysfunction. The most important factors identified in this series as predictors of a favourable outcome in CES were early diagnosis and early decompression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10483835      PMCID: PMC3611188          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

Review 1.  Cauda equina syndrome: a review of the current clinical and medico-legal position.

Authors:  Alan Gardner; Edward Gardner; Tim Morley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Easy drainage of presacral abscess.

Authors:  Vishal Nigam; H S Chhabra
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Epidemiological study of cauda equina syndrome.

Authors:  Fernando Augusto Freitas Fuso; André Luiz Natálio Dias; Olavo Biraghi Letaif; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Raphael Martus Marcon; Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa de Barros
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 4.  Complaints of micturition, defecation and sexual function in cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disk herniation: a systematic review.

Authors:  N S Korse; W C H Jacobs; H W Elzevier; C L A M Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sexual function in men with cauda equina lesions: a clinical and electromyographic study.

Authors:  S Podnar; C Oblak; D B Vodusek
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Do we know the outcome predictors for cauda equine syndrome (CES)? A retrospective, single-center analysis of 60 patients with CES with a suggestion for a new score to measure severity of symptoms.

Authors:  Alexander König; Lisa Amelung; Marco Danne; Ullrich Meier; Johannes Lemcke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Outcome of pedicle screw fixation and monosegmental fusion in patients with fresh thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Roop Singh; Rajesh Kumar Rohilla; Kulbhushan Kamboj; Narender Kumar Magu; Kiranpreet Kaur
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-06-09

8.  The value of interhospital transfer and emergency MRI for suspected cauda equina syndrome: a 2-year retrospective study.

Authors:  M Crocker; G Fraser; E Boyd; J Wilson; B P Chitnavis; N W Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Incidence and outcomes of spinal cord injury clinical syndromes.

Authors:  William McKinley; Katia Santos; Michelle Meade; Karen Brooke
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disc herniation and ossification of the yellow ligament.

Authors:  Masatoshi Yunoki; Michiari Umakoshi; Masaki Tatano; Ryoji Imoto
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.