Literature DB >> 10482757

Human eye-head gaze shifts in a distractor task. I. Truncated gaze shifts.

B D Corneil1, C A Hing, D V Bautista, D P Munoz.   

Abstract

This study examines two current ideas regarding the control of eye-head gaze shifts. The first idea stems from recent studies involving electrical stimulation in the primate superior colliculus that suggest that a residual feedback of gaze displacement persists for approximately 100 ms after completion of a gaze shift. In light of this hypothesis, we examined the accuracy of gaze shifts generated very soon after the end of a preceding gaze shift. Human subjects were presented with a visual or auditory target along with an accompanying stimulus of the other modality. The accompanying stimulus appeared either at the same place as the target or at the diametrically opposite position, in which case it was termed a distractor. Subjects often made an incorrect gaze shift (IGS) in the direction of the distractor, followed by a recorrect gaze shift (RGS) in the direction of the target. We found that RGSs were accurately driven to the target, even when they followed IGSs by <5 ms, regardless of the size of the IGS. The second idea is that a gaze shift cannot be cancelled in midflight. The end point of IGSs frequently fell short of the distractor. The dynamics of these movements, and of the head movement components during the IGSs in particular, suggests that these hypometric IGSs were planned for a much larger excursion but were truncated and superceded by the reversing RGSs. These results emphasize that the gaze shifting system can change the desired goal of a gaze shift in midflight and that the superceding movement is accurate regardless of the metrics or timing of the preceding movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10482757     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Predictiveness of a visual distractor modulates saccadic responses to auditory targets.

Authors:  Holle Kirchner; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Kinematics and eye-head coordination of gaze shifts evoked from different sites in the superior colliculus of the cat.

Authors:  Alain Guillaume; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Differential influence of attention on gaze and head movements.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Distinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Saccade trajectories evoked by sequential and colliding stimulation of the monkey superior colliculus.

Authors:  Christopher T Noto; James W Gnadt
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Active Braking of Whole-Arm Reaching Movements Provides Single-Trial Neuromuscular Measures of Movement Cancellation.

Authors:  Jeroen Atsma; Femke Maij; Chao Gu; W Pieter Medendorp; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.