Literature DB >> 10482698

Effect of nutritional route on colonic anastomotic healing in the rat.

T Kiyama1, D T Efron, U Tantry, A Barbul.   

Abstract

Although early enteral feeding has been shown to benefit cutaneous healing when compared to parenteral feeding, the effect of the route of nutritional support in gastrointestinal anastomotic healing has not been defined. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the route of nutritional support influences colonic anastomotic healing. Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 270 to 290 grams underwent identical surgical manipulation consisting of central venous catheterization, gastrostomy insertion, and distal colonic anastomosis (single-layer, inverted). Identical nutrient infusates composed of 4.25% amino acids, 25% dextrose, and vitamins were administered, with half the animals receiving the infusions via the gastrostomy and the other half via the venous catheter. Animals were killed 5 days after surgery. There were no differences in nutritional parameters between the parenterally and enterally fed groups. Colonic anastomotic bursting pressure was significantly higher in the enterally fed group (180 +/- 6 vs. 150 +/- 11 mm Hg; P <0.01). The measured insoluble collagen and total protein content in anastomotic tissue were enhanced in the enterally supported group. The fraction of soluble (newly synthesized) collagen did not differ between the two groups. The data demonstrate that the route of nutrient administration influences colonic anastomotic healing. The preservation of colonic structural collagen in the enteral group may improve the ability of the gut to hold sutures and thus enhance anastomotic healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10482698     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80062-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

1.  The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid.

Authors:  J F WOESSNER
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 2.  Nutritional support.

Authors:  W W Souba
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Improved wound healing response in surgical patients receiving intravenous nutrition.

Authors:  D A Haydock; G L Hill
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Factor contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  T R Schrock; C W Deveney; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Nutrition in wound healing.

Authors:  A Barbul; W A Purtill
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.541

6.  Bursting strength of experimental colonic anastomoses. A methodological study.

Authors:  H Christensen; S Langfelt; S Laurberg
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.745

7.  Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  K A Kudsk; M A Croce; T C Fabian; G Minard; E A Tolley; H A Poret; M R Kuhl; R O Brown
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A prospective, randomized trial of early enteral feeding after resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy.

Authors:  M J Heslin; L Latkany; D Leung; A D Brooks; S N Hochwald; P W Pisters; M Shike; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Collagen deposition and mechanical strength of colon anastomoses and skin incisional wounds of rats.

Authors:  H Oxlund; H Christensen; M Seyer-Hansen; T T Andreassen
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Route of nutritional supply influences local, systemic, and remote organ responses to intraperitoneal bacterial challenge.

Authors:  M T Lin; H Saito; R Fukushima; T Inaba; K Fukatsu; T Inoue; S Furukawa; I Han; T Muto
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection.

Authors:  Mohammad U Nasirkhan; Farshad Abir; Walter Longo; Robert Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition on colonic anastomotic healing in rats.

Authors:  T Kiyama; M Onda; A Tokunaga; D T Efron; A Barbul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Early postoperative oral feeding accelerates upper gastrointestinal anastomotic healing in the rat model.

Authors:  Junya Fukuzawa; Hideo Terashima; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Partial Enteral Nutrition Mitigated Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Damage of Rat Small Intestinal Barrier.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Xinying Wang; Tingting Jiang; Chaojun Li; Li Zhang; Xuejin Gao; Feng Tian; Ning Li; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Total Enteral Nutrition Facilitates Wound Healing Through Preventing Intestinal Atrophy, Keeping Protein Anabolism and Suppressing Inflammation.

Authors:  Yutaka Suzuki; Naruo Kawasaki; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Hironori Odaira; Takuji Noro
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2009-07-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.