Literature DB >> 104824

The inverse relationship between cost and survival in the critically ill cancer patient.

A D Turnbull, G Carlon, R Baron, W Sichel, C Young, W Howland.   

Abstract

The enormous cost of intensive multiple organ system support is apparent from patient or third party charges of $1500--$2000 per day exclusive of physician fees sampled during a retrospective review of 700 consecutive recent admissions to the Critical Care Facility of Memorial Cancer Center. Mortality rates of 49% for general medical, 54% for lymphoma or leukemia, and 20% for surgery patients suggest the need for a selective admission and discharge policy which concentrates financial and personnel resources on those for whom there remains a reasonable chance of worthwhile palliation, if not cure, of their malignancy. An informal policy of this kind may have contributed to a 10% increase in hospital discharges and a reduction of in-unit mortality from 22--18% when compared to 1035 earlier unselected admissions. A modified version of the classification suggested by the Critical Care Committee of the Massachusetts General Hospital has been adopted for use at this institution. A similar approach by other cancer centers is urged so that predictive indices based on prognosis of the underlying disease as well as physiological status may be developed. Otherwise, cost-benefit analysis by third party payers or government will become an unavoidable, and less satisfactory, alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 104824     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-197901000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  15 in total

1.  Survival and functional outcome after prolonged intensive care unit stay.

Authors:  P A Lipsett; S M Swoboda; J Dickerson; M Ylitalo; T Gordon; M Breslow; K Campbell; T Dorman; P Pronovost; B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Outcome of oncology patients in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Y Sivan; P H Schwartz; T Schonfeld; I J Cohen; C J Newth
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  "The high cost of dying": what do the data show? 1984.

Authors:  Anne A Scitovsky
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Reducing the costs of ICU admission in Canada without diagnosis-related or case-mix groupings.

Authors:  M J Girotti; S J Brown
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-11

5.  Factors predicting discharge from intensive care: a Canadian experience.

Authors:  M J Girotti; S J Brown
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-05

6.  Severity of illness and the relationship between intensive care and survival.

Authors:  R M Scheffler; W A Knaus; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Medical intensive care in a community teaching hospital.

Authors:  G H Murata; A G Ellrodt
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1982-05

8.  Is intensive care justified for patients with haematological malignancies?

Authors:  F Brunet; J J Lanore; J F Dhainaut; F Dreyfus; J F Vaxelaire; S Nouira; T Giraud; A Armaganidis; J F Monsallier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Paediatric oncology and intensive care treatments: changing trends.

Authors:  I N Keengwe; F Stansfield; O B Eden; N D Nelhans; O R Dearlove; A Sharples
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Prognosis of patients receiving intensive care for lifethreatening medical complications of haematological malignancy.

Authors:  A R Lloyd-Thomas; I Wright; T A Lister; C J Hinds
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.