Literature DB >> 10482083

Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities.

M A Björkgren1, U Häkkinen, U H Finne-Soveri, B E Fries.   

Abstract

Resource Utilization Groups, Version III (RUG-III) is a case-mix system developed in the USA for classification of long-term care residents. This paper examines the validity and reliability of an adapted 22-group version of RUG-III (RUG-III/22) for use in long-term care facilities in Finland. Finnish cost weights for RUG-III/22 groups are calculated and different methods for their computation are evaluated. The study sample (1,964 residents) was collected in 1995-96 from ten long-term care facilities in Finland. RUG-III/22 alone explained 38.2% of the variance of total patient-specific (nursing + auxiliary staff) per diem cost. Resource use within RUG groups was relatively homogeneous. Other predictors of resource use included age, gender and length of stay. RUG-III/22 also met the standard for good reliability (i.e. a kappa value of 0.6 or higher) for crucial classification items, such as activities of daily living and high correlation between assessments based on relative cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10482083     DOI: 10.1177/14034948990270030201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  11 in total

1.  Measuring efficiency of long-term care units in Finland.

Authors:  M A Björkgren; U Häkkinen; M Linna
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-09

2.  The cost efficiency and clinical quality of institutional long-term care for the elderly.

Authors:  Juha Laine; Miika Linna; Anja Noro; Unto Häkkinen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-05

3.  Classification of residents in nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) using Resource Utilization Groups Version III (RUG-III).

Authors:  Paolo Francesconi; Elisabetta Cantini; Emanuela Bavazzano; Fabrizio Lauretani; Stefania Bandinelli; Eva Buiatti; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  [Resident assessment instrument. Application options and relevance for Germany].

Authors:  Christian Grebe; Hermann Brandenburg
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  Evaluation of data quality of interRAI assessments in home and community care.

Authors:  Sophie E Hogeveen; Jonathan Chen; John P Hirdes
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Variation of Care Time Between Nursing Units in Classification-Based Nurse-to-Resident Ratios: A Multilevel Analysis.

Authors:  Albert Brühl; Katarina Planer; Anja Hagel
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  Comparing the case-mix of frail older people at home and of those being admitted into residential care: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Johanna de Almeida Mello; Sophie Cès; Dirk Vanneste; Thérèse Van Durme; Chantal Van Audenhove; Jean Macq; Brant Fries; Anja Declercq
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  An evaluation of data quality in Canada's Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS): secondary analyses of Ontario data submitted between 1996 and 2011.

Authors:  John P Hirdes; Jeff W Poss; Hilary Caldarelli; Brant E Fries; John N Morris; Gary F Teare; Kristen Reidel; Norma Jutan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Variations in levels of care between nursing home patients in a public health care system.

Authors:  Øystein Døhl; Helge Garåsen; Jorid Kalseth; Jon Magnussen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Significance of functional status data for payment and quality.

Authors:  Steven B Clauser; Arlene S Bierman
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.