J T Marais1, V S Brözel. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pretoria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of electro-chemically activated water on biofilm contamination in dental unit water lines. DESIGN: Thirteen dental units fitted with independent water systems and used for 12 years with distilled water were divided into two groups, A and B. At the start, one week later, and again four weeks later, the bacterial counts in water from all units were determined. Also specimens of tubing were taken from the units at the beginning and at the end of the study for SEM investigation. In Group A distilled water was replaced with electrochemically activated water (a Russian invention), and used continuously for the duration of the study. In group B, distilled water was used as before, until confirmed to be contaminated. For ethical reasons group B was treated, one week into the study with conventional disinfectants. SETTING: The project was carried out in a clinic of a department of periodontology of a faculty of dentistry during 1998. RESULTS: Both groups showed a marked reduction in bacterial counts. Under SEM Group A showed a total elimination of the biofilm and Group B a partial removal. CONCLUSIONS: Distilled water was ineffective in controlling bacterial counts and biofilm. Electrochemically activated water was effective for this purpose.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of electro-chemically activated water on biofilm contamination in dental unit water lines. DESIGN: Thirteen dental units fitted with independent water systems and used for 12 years with distilled water were divided into two groups, A and B. At the start, one week later, and again four weeks later, the bacterial counts in water from all units were determined. Also specimens of tubing were taken from the units at the beginning and at the end of the study for SEM investigation. In Group A distilled water was replaced with electrochemically activated water (a Russian invention), and used continuously for the duration of the study. In group B, distilled water was used as before, until confirmed to be contaminated. For ethical reasons group B was treated, one week into the study with conventional disinfectants. SETTING: The project was carried out in a clinic of a department of periodontology of a faculty of dentistry during 1998. RESULTS: Both groups showed a marked reduction in bacterial counts. Under SEM Group A showed a total elimination of the biofilm and Group B a partial removal. CONCLUSIONS: Distilled water was ineffective in controlling bacterial counts and biofilm. Electrochemically activated water was effective for this purpose.
Authors: A S Mahalakshmi; Vidhya Jeyapalan; Vallabh Mahadevan; Chitra Shankar Krishnan; N S Azhagarasan; Hariharan Ramakrishnan Journal: J Indian Prosthodont Soc Date: 2019 Jan-Mar