Literature DB >> 10481126

Cumulative risk of developing polyps or malignancy at the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

P van Duijvendijk1, H F Vasen, L Bertario, S Bülow, J H Kuijpers, W R Schouten, J G Guillem, C W Taat, J F Slors.   

Abstract

Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is performed in an increasing number of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Two techniques are currently used to construct an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: (1) a double-stapled anastomosis between the pouch and the anal canal and (2) mucosectomy with a hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis at the dentate line. Although this procedure is thought to abolish the risk of colorectal adenoma, an increasing number of case reports have been published concerning the development of adenoma at the anastomotic site. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall cumulative risk of developing adenomatous polyps after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and to compare the cumulative risk after either anastomotic technique. A total of 126 consecutive FAP patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy were identified from polyposis registries in The Netherlands, Denmark, Italy, Germany, and New York. Life-table analysis was used to calculate the cumulative risk of developing polyps in 97 patients with at least 1 year of endoscopic follow-up (median 66 months, range 12 to 188 months). A double-stapled anastomosis was used in 35 patients, whereas in 62 patients a hand-sewn anastomosis with a mucosectomy was performed. In 13 patients polyps developed at the anastomotic site, four with severe and four with moderate dysplasia. None of the patients developed a carcinoma at the anastomotic site. The cumulative risk of developing a polyp at the anastomotic site was 8% (95% confidence interval 2% to 14%) at 3.5 years and 18% (95% confidence interval 8% to 28%) at 7 years, respectively. The risk of developing a polyp at the anastomotic site within 7 years was 31% for patients with a double-stapled vs. 10% for patients with a hand-sewn anastomosis with mucosectomy (P = 0.03 [log-rank test]). Because FAP patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy with either a double-stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis have a substantial risk of developing adenomatous polyps at the anastomotic site, lifelong endoscopic surveillance is mandatory in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10481126     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80075-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  29 in total

1.  Rectal cancer risk in older patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and an ileorectal anastomosis: a cause for concern.

Authors:  K P Nugent; R K Phillips
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Comparison of performance status.

Authors:  J H Pemberton; S F Phillips; R R Ready; A R Zinsmeister; O H Beahrs
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Quality of life after prophylactic colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  J M Church; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J R Oakley; J Milsom; E McGannon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Stapled vs hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-04

5.  Randomized trial to determine the optimum level of pouch-anal anastomosis in stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  K I Deen; J G Williams; E A Grant; C Billingham; M R Keighley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Pouch-anal cancer after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  A von Herbay; J Stern; C Herfarth
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Function and quality of life results after ileal pouch surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis.

Authors:  E D Skarsgard; K G Atkinson; G A Bell; M E Pezim; A M Seal; F R Sharp
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Outcome of colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  J C Cooper; D Jones; N S Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Histological assessment of the distal 'doughnut' in patients undergoing stapled restorative proctocolectomy with high or low anal transection.

Authors:  K I Deen; S Hubscher; I Bain; R Patel; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Clinicopathological study of anorectal mucosa in total colectomy with mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  T Horai; M Kusunoki; Y Shoji; T Yamamura; J Utsunomiya
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1994-04
View more
  23 in total

1.  The 2005 Annual Meeting of the British Society of Gastroenterology. Birmingham, United Kingdom, 14-17 March 2005. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  [Preventive surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis coli].

Authors:  M Kadmon
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Familial adenomatous polyposis in pediatrics: natural history, emerging surveillance and management protocols, chemopreventive strategies, and areas of ongoing debate.

Authors:  Seth Septer; Caitlin E Lawson; Shrikant Anant; Thomas Attard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Inherited Polyposis Syndromes.

Authors:  Daniel Herzig; Karin Hardiman; Martin Weiser; Nancy You; Ian Paquette; Daniel L Feingold; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Subsequent Adenomas of Ileal Pouch and Anorectal Segment after Prophylactic Surgery for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  A E M'Koma; A J Herline; S E Adunyah
Journal:  World J Colorectal Surg       Date:  2013

6.  Residual rectal mucosa after stapled vs. handsewn ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP)--a critical issue.

Authors:  Petra Ganschow; Irmgard Treiber; Ulf Hinz; Christine Leowardi; Markus W Büchler; Martina Kadmon
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Inherited colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

8.  Colonic adenomatous polyposis syndromes: clinical management.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

9.  In the beginning there was colectomy: current surgical options in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Daniel R McGrath; Allan D Spigelman
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  Pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy for Spigelman stage IV duodenal polyposis associated with familial adenomatous polyposis: experience of 10 cases at a single institution.

Authors:  Yuichiro Watanabe; Hideyuki Ishida; Hiroyuki Baba; Takeo Iwama; Atsushi Kudo; Minoru Tanabe; Hideki Ishikawa
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.