Literature DB >> 10481115

Economic evaluation of the use of octreotide for prevention of complications following pancreatic resection.

L Rosenberg1, P MacNeil, L Turcotte.   

Abstract

Recent studies have concluded that octreotide can prevent complications in patients undergoing pancreatic resections. Given the acquisition cost of octreotide, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to establish whether if the additional cost associated with its use was justified by a decrease in the consumption of other resources. To evaluate success rates and complication rates, a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials was conducted. The rates for pancreatic fistula and fluid collection were 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9 to 13.4) and 3.6% (95% CI 1.9 to 5.2) for octreotide vs. 23.4% (95% CI 19.7 to 27. 1) and 8.8% (95% CI 6.2 to 11.3) for placebo. In a second phase we evaluated the treatment cost for patients with and without complications using two different models of cost savings. In the first model the cost to treat a pancreatic fistula was calculated as the per diem rate (as determined by Statistics Canada) multiplied by the incremental length of stay associated with the complication. In the second model we used data from institutions participating in the Ontario Case Costing Project. In model 1 the estimated incremental length of hospital stay attributed to a pancreatic fistula was 7 days, based on a review of the literature, and the per diem was $552. In model 2 the average cost of care for patients with or without complication was $32,347 (n = 17; 95% CI $20,882 to $43,812) and $11, 169 (n = 18; 95% CI $7558 to $14,779), respectively. The data suggest that when compared to placebo, octreotide is a dominant treatment strategy. In model 1, in a cohort of 100 patients, octreotide saved an average of $853 per patient while allowing 16 incremental patients to avoid complications. In model 2 use of octreotide resulted in an average savings of $1642 per patient while still allowing 16 patients to avoid complications. Detailed one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses suggest that both models were robust. The use of octreotide is a cost-effective strategy in patients undergoing elective pancreatic resection. Consideration should be given to extending its use to patients who are at high risk for development of complications following pancreatic surgery and who do not have any contraindications to the use of this drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10481115     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80064-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  25 in total

1.  A prospective cost analysis of pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  R F Holbrook; K Hargrave; L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

Authors:  T A Gordon; G P Burleyson; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life.

Authors:  M J Buxton; M F Drummond; B A Van Hout; R L Prince; T A Sheldon; T Szucs; M Vray
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

Review 5.  Review article: the relative effectiveness of somatostatin and octreotide therapy in pancreatic disease.

Authors:  S A Jenkins; A Berein
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Octreotide and postoperative enterocutaneous fistulae: a controlled prospective study.

Authors:  N A Scott; S Finnegan; M H Irving
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  1993 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Inhibition of pancreatic secretion to prevent postoperative complications following pancreatic resection.

Authors:  M Büchler; H Friess
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  1993 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Treatment of pancreatic cutaneous fistulas with a somatostatin analog.

Authors:  R A Prinz; J Pickleman; J P Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Prophylaxis of complications after pancreatic surgery: results of a multicenter trial in Germany.

Authors:  H Fiess; I Klempa; P Hermanek; U Sulkowski; W Uhl; H G Beger; M W Büchler
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Octreotide for treatment of postoperative alimentary tract fistulas.

Authors:  H Paran; D Neufeld; O Kaplan; J Klausner; U Freund
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Elijah Dixon; Morad Hameed; Francis Sutherland; Deborah J Cook; Christopher Doig
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Anastomotic leakage in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Roberto Salvia; Massimo Falconi; Giovanni Butturini; Luca Landoni; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  The Use of  Prophylactic Somatostatin Therapy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  A Adiamah; Z Arif; F Berti; S Singh; N Laskar; D Gomez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The value of drains as a fistula mitigation strategy for pancreatoduodenectomy: something for everyone? Results of a randomized prospective multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; William E Fisher; George Van Buren; Amy McElhany; Mark Bloomston; Steven J Hughes; Jordan Winter; Stephen W Behrman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Vic Velanovich; Kimberly Brown; Katherine A Morgan; Charles Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Double loop reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant tumor: Short-term outcome.

Authors:  Paolo Limongelli; A D'Alessandro; S Parisi; R Pirozzi; M Bondanese; C Colella; Giovanni Docimo; Gianmattia Del Genio; Alberto Del Genio; Ludovico Docimo
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-02-03

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness comparison of prophylactic octreotide and pasireotide for prevention of fistula after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Thilo Welsch; Benjamin Müssle; Marius Distler; Holger Knoth; Jürgen Weitz; Dennis Häckl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Risk factors affecting pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yun-Mee Choe; Keon-Young Lee; Cheong-Ah Oh; Joung-Bum Lee; Sun Keun Choi; Yoon-Seok Hur; Sei-Joong Kim; Young Up Cho; Seung-Ik Ahn; Kee-Chun Hong; Seok-Hwan Shin; Kyung-Rae Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The efficacy of the prophylactic use of octreotide after a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hyoun Jong Moon; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Jae Won Joh; Dong Wook Choi; Yong Il Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 9.  Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; W Shannon Orr; Ben L Zarzaur; Stephen W Behrman
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Complications of pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Choon-Kiat Ho; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.