Literature DB >> 10480746

A religious upbringing reduces the influence of genetic factors on disinhibition: evidence for interaction between genotype and environment on personality.

D I Boomsma1, E J de Geus, G C van Baal, J R Koopmans.   

Abstract

Information on personality, on anxiety and depression and on several aspects of religion was collected in 1974 Dutch families consisting of adolescent and young adult twins and their parents. Analyses of these data showed that differences between individuals in religious upbringing, in religious affiliation and in participation in church activities are not influenced by genetic factors. The familial resemblance for different aspects of religion is high, but can be explained entirely by environmental influences common to family members. Shared genes do not contribute to familial resemblances in religion. The absence of genetic influences on variation in several dimensions of religion is in contrast to findings of genetic influences on a large number of other traits that were studied in these twin families. Differences in religious background are associated with differences in personality, especially in Sensation Seeking. Subjects with a religious upbringing, who are currently religious and who engage in church activities score lower on the scales of the Sensation Seeking Questionnaire. The most pronounced effect is on the Disinhibition scale. The resemblances between twins for the Disinhibition scale differ according to their religious upbringing. Receiving a religious upbringing seems to reduce the influence of genetic factors on Disinhibition, especially in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10480746     DOI: 10.1375/136905299320565988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res        ISSN: 1369-0523


  29 in total

1.  Detecting specific genotype by environment interactions using marginal maximum likelihood estimation in the classical twin design.

Authors:  Dylan Molenaar; Sophie van der Sluis; Dorret I Boomsma; Conor V Dolan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Gene-environment interactions in mental disorders.

Authors:  Ming T Tsuang; Jessica L Bar; William S Stone; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Estimating non-response bias in family studies: application to mental health and lifestyle.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Vink; Gonneke Willemsen; Janine H Stubbe; Christel M Middeldorp; Rozemarijn S L Ligthart; Kim D Baas; Hanneke J C Dirkzwager; Eco J C de Geus; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  A finite mixture model for genotype and environment interactions: detecting latent population heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nathan A Gillespie; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.587

5.  Rural environments reduce the genetic influence on adolescent substance use and rule-breaking behavior.

Authors:  L N Legrand; M Keyes; M McGue; W G Iacono; R F Krueger
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Adolescent personality moderates genetic and environmental influences on relationships with parents.

Authors:  Susan C South; Robert F Krueger; Wendy Johnson; William G Iacono
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05

Review 7.  Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis": theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Michael M Vanyukov; Ralph E Tarter; Galina P Kirillova; Levent Kirisci; Maureen D Reynolds; Mary Jeanne Kreek; Kevin P Conway; Brion S Maher; William G Iacono; Laura Bierut; Michael C Neale; Duncan B Clark; Ty A Ridenour
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 8.  Gene-environment studies and borderline personality disorder: a review.

Authors:  Ryan W Carpenter; Rachel L Tomko; Timothy J Trull; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  The Nature-Nurture Debate is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity.

Authors:  Matt Bradshaw; Christopher G Ellison
Journal:  J Sci Study Relig       Date:  2009-06-01

10.  Born to be happy? The etiology of subjective well-being.

Authors:  Meike Bartels; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.