Literature DB >> 10480608

Comparison of tests of beta-cell function across a range of glucose tolerance from normal to diabetes.

M P Hermans1, J C Levy, R J Morris, R C Turner.   

Abstract

Adequate comparisons of the relative performance of different tests of beta-cell function are not available. We compared discrimination of commonly used in vivo tests of beta-cell function across a range of glucose tolerance in seven subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), eight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and nine subjects with type 2 diabetes. In random order, each subject underwent two of each of the following tests: 1) frequently sampled 0.3-g/kg intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) with MinMod analysis; 2) homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) from three samples at 5-min intervals with a model incorporating immunoreactive or specific insulin measurements; and 3) continuous infusion of 180 mg x min(-1) x m(-2) glucose with model assessment (CIGMA) of three samples at 50, 55, and 60 min (1-h CIGMA) and at 110, 115, and 120 min (2-h CIGMA). The discrimination of each test was assessed by the ratio of the within-subject SD to the underlying between-subject SD, the discriminant ratio (DR). The degree to which tests measured the same physiological variable was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient adjusted for attenuation due to test imprecision. An unbiased line of equivalence, taking into account the imprecision of both tests, was used to compare results. Beta-cell function assessed from HOMA and beta-cell function assessed from CIGMA (CIGMA%beta) (using immunoreactive insulin) had higher DRs than first-phase intravenous glucose tolerance test-derived incremental insulin peak, area, insulin-to-glucose index, and acute insulin response to glucose from FSIVGTT-MinMod. CIGMA%beta (immunoreactive insulin) had the highest DR. FSIVGTT-derived first-phase insulin response tests correlated only moderately with HOMA and CIGMA. Using specific rather than immunoreactive insulin for HOMA and CIGMA did not improve discriminatory power. Simple tests such as HOMA and CIGMA, using immunoreactive insulin, offer better beta-cell function discrimination across subjects with NGT, IGT, and type 2 diabetes than measurements derived from FSIVGTT first-phase insulin response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10480608     DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.48.9.1779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  43 in total

1.  FATP2 is a hepatic fatty acid transporter and peroxisomal very long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase.

Authors:  Alaric Falcon; Holger Doege; Amy Fluitt; Bernice Tsang; Nicki Watson; Mark A Kay; Andreas Stahl
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  Insulin resistance is not necessarily an essential element of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Rudruidee Karnchanasorn; Horng-Yi Ou; Lee-Ming Chuang; Ken C Chiu
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Approach to the obese adolescent with new-onset diabetes.

Authors:  Philip Zeitler
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  New insights into pancreatic cancer-induced paraneoplastic diabetes.

Authors:  Raghuwansh P Sah; Sajan Jiv Singh Nagpal; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Suresh T Chari
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Cinnamaldehyde ameliorates STZ-induced rat diabetes through modulation of IRS1/PI3K/AKT2 pathway and AGEs/RAGE interaction.

Authors:  Marwa E Abdelmageed; George S Shehatou; Rami A Abdelsalam; Ghada M Suddek; Hatem A Salem
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Review of methods for measuring β-cell function: Design considerations from the Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) Consortium.

Authors:  Tamara S Hannon; Steven E Kahn; Kristina M Utzschneider; Thomas A Buchanan; Kristen J Nadeau; Philip S Zeitler; David A Ehrmann; Silva A Arslanian; Sonia Caprio; Sharon L Edelstein; Peter J Savage; Kieren J Mather
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 6.577

7.  TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) protects against diabetes and atherosclerosis in Apoe ⁻/⁻ mice.

Authors:  B A Di Bartolo; J Chan; M R Bennett; S Cartland; S Bao; B E Tuch; M M Kavurma
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Association of insulin resistance with serum ferritin and aminotransferases-iron hypothesis.

Authors:  Jean Huang; Rudruidee Karnchanasorn; Horng-Yih Ou; Wei Feng; Lee-Ming Chuang; Ken C Chiu; Raynald Samoa
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-20

9.  A variation in the cerebroside sulfotransferase gene is linked to exercise-modified insulin resistance and to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  A Roeske-Nielsen; K Buschard; J E Månson; L Rastam; U Lindblad
Journal:  Exp Diabetes Res       Date:  2009-07-05

10.  Large effects on body mass index and insulin resistance of fat mass and obesity associated gene (FTO) variants in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Authors:  Susanne Tan; André Scherag; Onno Eilard Janssen; Susanne Hahn; Harald Lahner; Tiina Dietz; Susann Scherag; Harald Grallert; Carla Ivane Ganz Vogel; Rainer Kimmig; Thomas Illig; Klaus Mann; Johannes Hebebrand; Anke Hinney
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.