Literature DB >> 10480216

A pilot study of low-dose fludarabine in membranous nephropathy refractory to therapy.

D T Boumpas1, I O Tassiulas, T A Fleisher, E Vaughan, S Piscitelli, Y Kim, F Pucino, J E Balow, H A Austin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymphocytes are believed to play a role in the induction and perpetuation of membranous nephropathy. Fludarabine is a purine nucleoside analog with selective activity against both dividing and resting lymphocytes. We evaluated the tolerance, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, immunologic, and clinical effects of fludarabine in patients with membranous nephropathy in an single arm pilot study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients with idiopathic (n = 7) or lupus (n = 1) membranous nephropathy who had failed high-dose prednisone (n = 8) and/or alkylating agents (n = 2), or cyclosporine (n = 1) were treated with 6-monthly cycles of fludarabine (cycles 1-2, 20 mg/m2/day x 2 days, cycles 3-6, 20 mg/m2/day x 3 days). Mean proteinuria was 9 g/day with a mean duration of disease of 25 months (range 12-48). Proteinuria, GFR and effective renal plasma flow were compared before and after completing the treatment.
RESULTS: Seven patients completed the protocol. CD3, CD4, CD8 and B cell counts decreased by 53%, 46%, 61% and 84%, respectively, at the end of treatment and remained at lower than pretreatment levels 6 months after completing the trial. Despite lymphopenia, serum immunoglobulin levels remained unchanged. Both naive (CD45RA+) and memory CD4+ T cells (CD45RO+) were reduced (naive > memory). Proteinuria decreased by > or = 50% in 5 out of 7 patients (p = 0.11). Filtration fraction improved in all patients with decreased filtration fraction at baseline. The only side-effect observed was one episode of acute bacterial sinusitis that responded promptly to antibiotic therapy.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that low-dose fludarabine treatment in patients with membranous nephropathy is well tolerated and results in significant lymphopenia involving B more than T cells. In this pilot study improvement in proteinuria and filtration rate were observed. Additional studies are required to determine the optimal dose and clinical efficacy of fludarabine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10480216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-0430            Impact factor:   0.975


  6 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of severe proliferative lupus nephritis: the current state.

Authors:  C C Mok; R W S Wong; K N Lai
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Population pharmacokinetic/dynamic model of lymphosuppression after fludarabine administration.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Paolo Vicini; David H Salinger; Paul V O'Donnell; Brenda M Sandmaier; Claudio Anasetti; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Treatment of lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Fayez F Hejaili; Louise M Moist; William F Clark
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Membranous nephropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a therapeutic enigma.

Authors:  Chi Chiu Mok
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  Newer drugs for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Dudy G Kuiper-Geertsma; Ronald H W M Derksen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Simultaneous clinical resolution of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis associated with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab.

Authors:  Spyridon Arampatzis; Nikolaos Giannakoulas; Vassilios Liakopoulos; Theodoros Eleftheriadis; Panagiota Kourti; Foteini Karasavvidou; Panagiota Matsouka; Ioannis Stefanidis
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.388

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.