Literature DB >> 10479826

Visual effects in picture and word categorization.

L Lotto1, R Job, R Rumiati.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported in which participants categorized stimuli as belonging or not belonging to the category of fruits. Blocks of pictures and words were used, with items referring to exemplars having either high or low intercategory visual similarity and/or semantic relatedness. For both pictures and words, response time was longer in the semantically related conditions than in the unrelated condition. Furthermore, there was a strong effect of visual similarity for pictures but not for words when semantic relatedness was held constant: Participants took longer to classify pictures of fruits when these were mixed with visually similar vegetables than when they were mixed with visually dissimilar vegetables. Reducing the stimulus visibility by adding a dot pattern had an additive effect for words but an interactive effect for pictures. The results are explained in terms of a unique locus for category decisions about pictures and words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479826     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  The picture superiority effect in categorization: visual or semantic?

Authors:  R Job; R Rumiati; L Lotto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

4.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.

Authors:  D Marr; H K Nishihara
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1978-02-23

5.  Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons.

Authors:  A B Markman; D Gentner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-03

6.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

8.  The role of visual similarity in picture categorization.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; B McCullough
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  On beyond zebra: the relation of linguistic and visual information.

Authors:  R Jackendoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-07

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Naming pictures at no cost: asymmetries in picture and word conditional naming.

Authors:  Remo Job; Elena Tenconi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Speed of processing explains the picture-word asymmetry in conditional naming.

Authors:  Claudio Mulatti; Lorella Lotto; Francesca Peressotti; Remo Job
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-12

3.  What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge.

Authors:  Frank E Garcea; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

4.  Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Paul Del Prato; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-21

5.  It takes biking to learn: Physical activity improves learning a second language.

Authors:  Fengqin Liu; Simone Sulpizio; Suchada Kornpetpanee; Remo Job
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.