Literature DB >> 10479364

Illumination and the perception of remote habitat patches by white-footed mice.

.   

Abstract

Perceptual range, or the distance at which habitat 'patches' can be perceived, constrains an animal's informational window on a given landscape. If such constraints are great, they may limit successful dispersal between distant habitat patches. On dark nights, nocturnal white-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus, have surprisingly limited perceptual abilities regarding distant forested habitat. In fact, their ability to orient towards such habitat while travelling in a bare agricultural field indicates a perceptual range under 30 m. However, increasing illumination can increase perceptual range. For example, full moonlight extends the perceptual range of mice to about 60 m. Light levels at dusk (twilight) extend perceptual range still further to about 90 m. These results suggest that interpatch dispersal by white-footed mice would be more successful under greater illumination, but travelling under such conditions entails a considerable risk of predation. These mice might avoid such a conflict by travelling under the cover of darkness with the aid of information gathered remotely during relatively high illumination. We show that mice are indeed capable of such a 'look now and move later' strategy: mice retain directional information gained under bright conditions and maintain a previously determined bearing in conditions under which distant navigational stimuli may be largely absent (e.g. maximal darkness). Ultimately, a better understanding of the behavioural and ecological factors affecting the movements of animals across landscapes should produce a clearer picture of the interaction between landscape structure and population ecology. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479364     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  7 in total

1.  Phenotypic plasticity of reproductive traits in response to food availability and photoperiod in white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus).

Authors:  Sarah J Reilly; Robert Oum; Paul D Heideman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Why are some animal populations unaffected or positively affected by roads?

Authors:  Trina Rytwinski; Lenore Fahrig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Lunar and temperature effects on activity of free-living desert hamsters (Phodopus roborovskii, Satunin 1903).

Authors:  Elke Scheibler; Corinna Roschlau; David Brodbeck
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models.

Authors:  L Conradt; E J Bodsworth; T J Roper; C D Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Increasing predation risk with light reduces speed, exploration and visit duration of invasive ship rats (Rattus rattus).

Authors:  Bridgette Farnworth; Richard Meitern; John Innes; Joseph R Waas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  SEARCH: Spatially Explicit Animal Response to Composition of Habitat.

Authors:  Benjamin P Pauli; Nicholas P McCann; Patrick A Zollner; Robert Cummings; Jonathan H Gilbert; Eric J Gustafson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stochastic optimal foraging: tuning intensive and extensive dynamics in random searches.

Authors:  Frederic Bartumeus; Ernesto P Raposo; Gandhimohan M Viswanathan; Marcos G E da Luz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.