Local tumor recurrence or emergence of a new primary lesion? A molecular analysis.

The distinction between a new primary oral tumor and recurrence may bear significant prognostic implications. Currently, this differentiation relies mainly on tumor location: when both lesions are at or near the same site, the new one is regarded as a recurrence; when the two are at different sites, the second lesion is regarded as a new primary. Recent investigations using molecular analysis have demonstrated that some oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) arising from different sites show the same clonogenical changes. In this case report, we studied the clonality of three SCC (one primary, two apparent recurrences) from the right lateral tongue of a young, non-smoking woman by using microsatellite analysis for loss of heterozygosity. The results showed that while the first two tumors were clonogenically similar, the third tumor was clonogenically different and was consistent with the development of a new primary. This result indicates that location of tumors alone is not always reliable in determining whether a new tumor is a recurrence or a new primary lesion.