S K Aytaç1, H Ozcan. 1. Department of Radiology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the color Doppler system on the artifact known as the "twinkling sign." METHODS: Sixty-five patients with at least 1 urinary tract calculus seen on sonography were examined with color Doppler sonography. Two color Doppler systems of 2 different generations were used. Examinations included gray-scale, color Doppler, power Doppler, and spectral evaluations of the calculus with various settings of Doppler gain, velocity range, color filter, focal depth, and acoustic power. RESULTS: A color artifact was present within and/or distal to 29 (39%) of 75 urinary tract calculi when the old generation system was used. Use of the new generation system produced this color artifact within and/or distal to 72 (96%) of the urinary tract calculi. The intensity of the artifact was affected by the acoustic output of the equipment. CONCLUSIONS: The twinkling sign is an artifact that can not only lead to misdiagnosis of vascular flow within a structure but also help differentiate a very small stone from other small echogenic structures when later generation "all-digital" systems are used. The color sensitivity of the system and acoustic power used are important technical factors that affect the production of this artifact. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the color Doppler system on the artifact known as the "twinkling sign." METHODS: Sixty-five patients with at least 1 urinary tract calculus seen on sonography were examined with color Doppler sonography. Two color Doppler systems of 2 different generations were used. Examinations included gray-scale, color Doppler, power Doppler, and spectral evaluations of the calculus with various settings of Doppler gain, velocity range, color filter, focal depth, and acoustic power. RESULTS: A color artifact was present within and/or distal to 29 (39%) of 75 urinary tract calculi when the old generation system was used. Use of the new generation system produced this color artifact within and/or distal to 72 (96%) of the urinary tract calculi. The intensity of the artifact was affected by the acoustic output of the equipment. CONCLUSIONS: The twinkling sign is an artifact that can not only lead to misdiagnosis of vascular flow within a structure but also help differentiate a very small stone from other small echogenic structures when later generation "all-digital" systems are used. The color sensitivity of the system and acoustic power used are important technical factors that affect the production of this artifact. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Authors: Tong Li; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Matthew O'Donnell; Joo Ha Hwang Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Julianna C Simon; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Wayne Kreider; Michael Breshock; James C Williams; Michael R Bailey Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Julianna C Simon; James R Holm; Jeffrey Thiel; Barbrina Dunmire; Bryan W Cunitz; Michael R Bailey Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Ryan S Hsi; Anup R Shah; Manjiri K Dighe; Stephen J Carter; Mariam Moshiri; Marla Paun; Wei Lu; Michael R Bailey Journal: J Endourol Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 2.942