What is the real clinical utility of echocardiography? A prospective observational study.

This was a prospective, structured interview to evaluate physician expectations of echocardiography and the subsequent impact on patient care. The setting involved requests for echocardiograms in patients admitted to a tertiary care teaching hospital. Measurements included assessment of the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of echocardiography perceived by the physicians and subsequently reported and confirmed by blinded chart review. From January to May 1997, 542 echocardiograms were performed on 500 inpatients (age 62 +/- 17 years; 56% men). Referring physicians were mainly house staff (83%) and from medical services. The main indications were evaluation of left ventricular function (54%) or valve function (16%). At the time of the request, 89% of physicians believed that echocardiography was needed to guide future investigations or treatment, although in 24% of cases, physicians could not provide details of such. A reported change in treatment occurred in 57% and was validated by chart review in 38%. Changes occurred more frequently in patients in the intensive care unit versus those not in the intensive care unit (54% vs 37%, P =.02) but were similar between attending physicians and house staff (frequency of change 41% vs 39%, P = not significant) and between those with and those without previous echocardiograms (38% vs 39%, P = not significant). The utility of the echocardiogram to influence treatment decisions in hospitalized patients is high, especially in critically ill patients. However, this impact is less than is anticipated at the time of the initial request. Further studies involving more select populations of patients are required.